SALMA AND ANR Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Writ Petition (Crl.), 16 of 2013, Judgment Date: Sep 07, 2015

                                                        NON-REPORTABLE


                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION


               WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.16 OF 2013


SALMA & ANR.                                               ... PETITIONER(S)

                                 VS.

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.                                       ... RESPONDENT(S)




                        J U D G M E N T




ANIL R. DAVE, J.



1.    After hearing the learned  counsel for the  petitioners  and  perusing
the record, we note the fact that four First Information Reports  have  been
filed by the petitioners.
2.    It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners  that
the petitioners have threat to their lives.
3.    If the petitioners  have  any  grievance,  they  should  approach  the
concerned Authority and if there is any threat  to  their  lives,  they  may
approach the Superintendent of Police, Meerut so  that  they  can  be  given
proper protection, if the said officer thinks it necessary.


4.    It is also the grievance of the petitioners that their son  Nazim  has
been missing since 2007.
5.    It would be open to the petitioners to approach the High Court by  way
of Habeas Corpus petition and if they approach the High Court, we  are  sure
that the High Court will look into it.
6.    With the  above  observations,  the  writ  petition  is  disposed  of.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.


                                                            ..............J.
                                                              [ANIL R. DAVE]



                                                            ..............J.
                                                         [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL]
New Delhi;
7th September, 2015.