PRABHA SHARMA Vs. SUNIL GOYAL & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 632-633 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 17, 2017
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 632-633 OF 2017
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) Nos. 25552-25553 OF 2011 ]
PRABHA SHARMA Appellant (s)
VERSUS
SUNIL GOYAL & ORS. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant is aggrieved by certain observations in the impugned
Judgment, which according to the appellant, are adverse in nature.
3. Having gone through the impugned Judgment, we find that the Court, in
the impugned Judgment, has mainly stated the legal position, making it
clear that the judicial officers are bound to follow the Judgments of the
High Court and also the binding nature of the Judgments of this Court in
terms of Article 141 of the Constitution of India.
4. We do not find any observation in the impugned Judgment which
reflects on the integrity of the appellant. Therefore, it is not necessary
to expunge any of the observations in the impugned Judgment.
5. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that based on this
Judgment, disciplinary proceedings have been initiated against the
appellant by the High Court. We make it clear that the High Court is at
liberty to proceed with the disciplinary proceedings and arrive at an
independent decision, however, uninfluenced by any of the observations made
in the Judgment.
6. Since the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the appellant
have been pending for long, we request the High Court to finalise the same
expeditiously.
7. In view of the above, the civil appeals are disposed of.
No costs.
.......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J.
[ A. M. KHANWILKAR ]
New Delhi;
January 17, 2017.