MUKUL SARMA Vs. SABITA CHAKRABORTY
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 713-714 of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 01, 2016
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 713-714 OF 2016
[@ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 5516-5517 of 2015]
MUKUL SARMA Appellant (s)
VERSUS
SABITA CHAKRABORTY Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant approached this Court with certain grievances regarding
permanent alimony to be paid to the respondent. The High Court has
directed payment of Rs. 7,00,000/- for the respondent and Rs.3,00,000/- for
the child born to the appellant and the responent.
3. On service of notice on the respondent, through a Legal Aid counsel,
the respondent has informed this Court that she is not in a position to go
over to Delhi because of certain family circumstances.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the
view that no interference is called for as regards the amount of alimony
fixed by the High Court. However, having regard to the difficulties
personally faced by the appellant, it would be appropriate that the
appellant is granted more time for the payment of the amount. Therefore,
the payment of alimony, as directed by the High Court, is rescheduled as
under :-
i) The amount of Rs. 3,00,000/- payable to the daughter shall be paid
within a period of one month from today. In case, any amount has been
deposited in the Family Court, the same can be duly adjusted.
ii) As far as the amount of Rs. 7,00,000/- payable to the respondent is
concerned, the appellant is permitted to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- on or before
31.05.2016. Thereafter, the appellant shall pay the amount in six monthly
installments of Rs. 1,00,000/- each by the end of each calender month and
the whole payment shall be paid to the respondent by the end of November,
2016.
5. We make it clear that if there is any consecutive default in making
the payment, as above, apart from the steps to be taken for execution, the
appellant shall also be liable to answer in contempt.
6. With the above directions, the civil appeals are disposed of with no
order as to costs.
.......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J.
[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]
New Delhi;
February 01, 2016.