M. THANGAVEL Vs. R. PALANI
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2565-2566 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2565-2566/2017
[@ SLP (C)NOS.191-192/2015]
M. THANGAVEL Appellant(s)
VERSUS
R. PALANI Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant-tenant is aggrieved by the order of eviction granted by
the Rent Controller, Chennai. The said order has been upheld by the
Appellate Court and confirmed by the High Court. The landlord had taken
two grounds: 1) arrears of rent and, 2) bona fide requirement for own use.
3. It appears that the petition was considered only on the ground of
arrears of rent since the landlord, according to the Rent Controller, the
Appellate Authority and the High Court, was entitled to succeed on that
ground. While the matter was pending before this Court, by order dated
16.01.2015, this Court fixed the use and occupation charges at the rate of
Rs.10,000/- with effect from 01.01.2015. The said amount is being paid
ever since.
4. The counsel for both sides on instructions have fairly submitted that
the tenancy can be continued on revised terms in case the landlord is
granted the liberty to file a fresh petition for eviction on all grounds
available now.
5. We see no reason to deny the request since admittedly neither the
Rent Controller nor, for that matter, the Appellate Authority or the High
Court has gone into other aspects.
6. Since the parties are agreed on the above course of action, the
appeal is disposed of fixing the rent for the premises from the month of
March, 2017 as Rs.15,000/- per month which shall be paid before the 10th of
every month to the landlord. The payment can be made by the appellant-
tenant to the landlord through cheque or net banking. The landlord is also
given the liberty to institute fresh proceedings on any of the available
grounds for possession of the premises under the Tamil Nadu Building (Lease
& Rent Control) Act, 1960.
7. The appeals are disposed of in the above terms.
…......................J
[KURIAN JOSEPH]
….....................J.
[A.M. KHANWILKAR]
NEW DELHI;
FEBRUARY 14, 2017.