M/S. SECURE METERS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 7526 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7526 OF 2004
M/S. SECURE METERS LTD. .....APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
NEW DELHI .....RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
A.K. SIKRI, J.
The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of electricity
meters. In September 2000, the appellant imported a consignment consisting
of LCD Modules (Printed Circuit Boards) and Liquid Crystal Display (LCD)
from Hong Kong. The classification of the LCD Module is not in dispute.
The dispute in the instant case relates to classification of LCDs. The
appellant sought clearance of LCDs under Chapter Heading 9013.80 and
claimed assessment at Nil rate (basic duty), 16% additional duty and 4%
SAD. As per the appellant, since the LCDs were classifiable under Chapter
Heading 9013.80, in view of Notification No. 16/2000, and particularly
Entry/S.No. 304 of the table of the said Notification, the goods classified
under Heading 9013.80 attracted Nil rate of basic custom duty. That was
the reason for claiming assessment at Nil rate insofar as basic duty is
concerned. However, the case of the respondent/custom authorities is that
on verification it was found that the goods were not simple liquid crystal.
On the contrary, these were LCD Modules and Elastomeric LCD Displays and
were part of Energy Meter. The relevant invoices also described the goods
as “electronic part for energy meter”. The drawing and literature which
were provided did not specify the purpose.
The Deputy Commissioner, Customs (Adjudicating Authority), thus, passed
orders dated 31.08.2001 holding that LCDs were classifiable under Chapter
Heading 9028.90 and not under 9013.80 as claimed by the appellant. For
classifying the goods under the aforesaid category, recourse to Rule 3(c)
of the General Rules for the Interpretation of the First Schedule – Import
Tariff was taken by the Adjudicating Authority. The Deputy Commissioner
observed that even if he considered the goods to be devices, then only
those LCD devices/displays which do not constitute articles provided for
more specifically in other heading would cover in Chapter Heading 9013 and,
accordingly, he took the view that the goods are specific part of the
electricity meter and, thus, classified the same under Chapter Heading
9028.90 as parts of electricity meter.
The aforesaid order of the Adjudicating Authority has been affirmed by the
Commissioner as well as CESTAT resulting into dismissal of appeals filed by
the appellant herein. The decision of CESTAT reveals that appellant relied
upon its earlier decision in the case of CCE, Bombay v. Universal
Information Commn. Equipment Ltd.[1] However, the Tribunal has held that
the aforesaid decision is not applicable to the facts of the present case.
The Tribunal has accepted the contention of the Revenue that the invoices
issued by the supplier of the goods specifically mentioned that these were
parts of electronic energy meters and even the appellant had admitted that
these goods had to be issued as parts of energy meter.
Since the appellant claims that the LCDs fall under Chapter Heading 9013.80
and the argument of the Revenue is that these are rightly classified under
Heading 9028.90, we may first take note of these Chapter Headings:
|Tariff Item | |Description of Goods |
|(1) | |(2) |
| | | |
|9013 | |Liquid Crystal Devices not constituting|
| | |articles provided for more specifically|
| | |in other headings; lasers, other than |
| | |laser diodes; other optical appliances |
| | |and instruments, not specified or |
| | |included elsewhere in this Chapter |
| | | |
|9013.80 | |Other devices, appliances and |
| | |instruments; |
| | | |
|901380.10 | |Liquid Crystal Devices (LCD) |
| | | |
|9028 | |Gas, Liquid or electricity supply or |
| | |production meters, including |
| | |calibrating meters therefor |
| | | |
|9028.90 | |Parts and accessories |
| | | |
|9028.90.10 | |For electricity meters |
One thing is clear. Both the tariff items under which classification is
sought by the appellant as well as the authorities, fall under Chapter 90.
Therefore, it would be advisable to refer to the relevant provisions of
Note 2 to Chapter 90 as these notes are inserted to guide how the goods are
to be classified under this Chapter. Heading of Chapter 90 is as follows:
“Optical, photographic, cinematographic, measuring, checking, precision,
medical or surgical instruments and apparatus; parts and accessories
thereof”
Note 1 of this Chapter stipulates certain items which are not covered under
this Chapter. Obviously, this Note does not concern us in the present
appeal. Note 2, which is material for the purposes of this appeal, is
reproduced below:
“ 2. Subject to Note 1 above, parts and accessories for machines,
apparatus, instruments or articles of this Chapter are to be classified
according to the following rules:
(a) Parts and accessories which are goods included in any of the headings
of this Chapter or of Chapter 84, 85 or 91 (other than heading No.84, 85,
85.48 or 90.33) are in all cases to be classified in their respective
headings;
(b) other parts and accessories, if suitable for use solely or principally
with a particular kind of machine, instrument or apparatus, or with a
number of machines, instruments or apparatus of the same heading (including
a machine, instrument or apparatus of heading No. 90.10, 90.13 or 90.31)
are to be classified with the machines, instruments or apparatus of that
kind;
(c) all other parts and accessories are to be classified in heading No.
90.33.”
It is not in dispute that the goods in question which are imported by the
appellant are LCDs. It is also not in dispute that these devices are used
in electricity supply meters. Since the LCDs are used for electronic
supply meters by the appellant, the Revenue has taken the view that it
would fall in tariff item No. 9028.90 as that entry specifically includes,
amongst others, electricity supply meters. As LCDs are used as part of the
electricity supply meters, they are held to be covered under sub-heading
9028.90 by the Revenue. It may be emphasised that in coming to this
conclusion, the authorities below have been influenced by the fact that the
goods imported are actually used as parts of electronic energy meters and
the appellant has even admitted the same.
Challenging the aforesaid view of the authorities, submission of Mr.
Lakshmikumaran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, is that when
the specific description of the goods in question, namely, LCDs, is
distinctly covered by another tariff item which is 9013, it has to be
classified in that entry and the factum of its use as part or accessory in
the electronic energy meters would be of no consequence and, therefore, it
cannot be held to be covered by tariff item 9028.90. The submission,
precisely, was that whenever a particular item of goods falls in a specific
tariff item, it has to be classified under the said tariff item and not in
other item where it can be used as part thereof.
Mr. Lakshmikumaran has also placed heavy reliance upon Note 2 attached to
Chapter 90 and argued that as per Note 2(a), parts and accessories, which
has goods included in any of the headings of said Chapter 90 (or of Chapter
84, 85 or 91), are to be classified in their respective headings.
Ms. Kiran Suri, learned senior counsel appearing for the
respondent/department, argued, per contra, that in the present case goods
were specifically meant for use as parts in electric meters, which is even
accepted by the appellant. Therefore, Note 2 would not apply in this case.
She submitted that under these circumstances it is the General Rule of
Interpretation that would apply and referred to Rule 3 of the said Rules
and contended that if the goods are classifiable under two or more
headings, on the application of Rule 2(b) of the General Rules of
Interpretation, then the classification has to be in the manner stipulated
in Rule 3 of the General Rules. Rules 2 and 3 are as under:
“2. (a) Any reference in a heading to an article shall be taken to include
a reference to that article incomplete or unfinished, provided that, as
presented, the incomplete or unfinished article has the essential character
of the complete or finished article. It shall also be taken to include a
reference to that article complete or finished (or falling to be classified
as complete or finished by virtue of this rule) presented unassembled or
dis-assembled.
(b) Any reference in a heading to a material or substance shall be taken
to include a reference to mixtures or combinations of that material or
substance with other materials or substances. Any reference to goods of a
given material or substance shall be taken to include a reference to goods
consisting wholly or partly of such material or substance. The
classification of goods consisting of more than one material or substance
shall be according to the principles of rule 3.
3. When by application of rule 2(b) or for any other reason, goods are,
prima facie, classifiable under two or more headings, classification shall
be effected as follows:
(a) The heading which provides the most specific description shall be
preferred to headings providing a more general description. However, when
two or more headings each refer to part only of the materials or substances
contained in mixed or composite goods or to part only of the items in a set
put up for retail sale, those headings are to be regarded as equally
specific in relation to those gods, even if one of them gives a more
complete or precise description of the goods.
(b) Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different materials or made up
of different components, and goods put up in sets for retail sale, which
cannot be classified by reference to (a), shall be classified as if they
consisted of the material or component which gives them their essential
character, insofar as this criterion is applicable.
(c) When goods cannot be classified by reference to (a) or (b), they shall
be classified under the heading which occurs last in numerical order among
those which equally merit consideration.”
She argued that as per Rule 3(a) of the Rules, it was incumbent to classify
the goods in that heading which provides 'the most specific description' in
contrast with the heading providing for a more general description. She
also referred to the following portion of the assessment order made by the
Commissioner of Customs to buttress her aforesaid submission:
“Even if we ignore the above definition of device and consider the imported
parts i.e. Liquid Crystal Displays to be “devices”, only those liquid
crystal devices/displays which do not constitute article provided for more
specifically in other headings will be covered in CTH 90.13. In other
words, liquid crystal devices/displays which do not specifically form part
of a specific type of equipment will be classified here. General purpose
LCD, for example the one displaying only 0-9 numbers, which can be attached
to several devices/equipments and cannot be specifically covered in any one
heading as parts are to be classified here if they are considered as
devices. Had the intention been to cover all Liquid Crystal
Devices/displays in CTH 90.13 there was no need for the description -
“Liquid Crystal Devices not constituting articles provided for more
specifically in other headings.”
And “Liquid Crystal Device” would have been sufficient instead. The only
way to make Liquid Crystal Device/display more specifically covered in
other heading is to make it a part of a specific articles as in present
case.
There can be an argument whether being part of a specific goods can make
LCD more specifically covered in that heading as part of the specified
equipment as compared to CTH 90.13, but there can be no doubt that such
situation certainly makes it classifiable in other heading (e.g. CTH
9029.90 in present case). And when any good is classifiable in two or more
headings, then as per Rule 3(c) of General Rules for Interpretation, the
heading which occurs last in numeric order is to be preferred.”
We have given due consideration to the aforesaid submissions made by
learned counsel for the parties.
We may point out at the outset that Rule 3 of the General Rules, which is
sought to be invoked by the Department, would be seen and examined if the
classification cannot be determined according to the terms of the headings
and relevant Section and Chapter Notes thereof. It is clearly provided in
Rule 1 of the General Rules itself, which reads as under:
“Classification of goods in this Schedule shall be governed by the
following principles:
1. The titles of Sections, Chapters and sub-Chapters are provided for ease
of reference only; for legal purposes, classification shall be determined
according to the terms of the headings and any relative Section or Chapter
Notes and, provided such headings or Notes do not otherwise require,
according to the following provisions:
xx xx xx”
It is manifest from the reading of this Rule that we will
have to first undertake the exercise of finding out as to whether the goods
in question can be classified, taking aid of the Chapter Notes on which
reliance is placed. This position is made amplified in Commissioner of
Central Excise, Nagpur v. Simplex Mills Co. Ltd.[2], this Court held that
the Rules for the Interpretation of the Schedule to the Central Excise
Tariff Act, 1985 have been framed pursuant to the powers under Section 2 of
that Act. The relevant para is reproduced below:
“11. The Rules for the Interpretation of the Schedule to the Central Excise
Tariff Act, 1985 have been framed pursuant to the powers under Section 2 of
that Act. According to Rule 1 titles of sections and chapters in the
Schedule are provided for ease of reference only. But for legal purposes,
classification “shall be determined according to the terms of the headings
and any relevant section or chapter notes”. If neither the heading nor the
notes suffice to clarify the scope of a heading, then it must be construed
according to the other following provisions contained in the Rules. Rule 1
gives primacy to the section and chapter notes along with terms of the
headings. They should be first applied. If no clear picture emerges then
only can one resort to the subsequent rules. The appellants have relied
upon Rule 3. Rule 3 must be understood only in the context of sub-rule (b)
of Rule 2 which says inter alia that the classification of goods consisting
of more than one material or substance shall be according to the principles
contained in Rule 3. Therefore when goods are prima facie, classifiable
under two or more headings, classification shall be effected according to
sub-rules (a), (b) and (c) of Rule 3 and in that order. The sub-rules are
quoted:
“3. (a) The heading which provides the most specific description shall be
preferred to heading providing a more general description. However, when
two or more headings each refer to part only of the materials or substances
contained in mixed or composite goods or to part only of the items in a
set, those headings are to be regarded as equally specific in relation to
those goods, even if one of them gives a more complete or precise
description of the goods.
(b) Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different materials or made up
of different components, and goods put up in sets, which cannot be
classified by reference to (a), shall be classified as if they consisted of
the material or component which gives them their essential character,
insofar as this criterion is applicable.
(c) When goods cannot be classified by reference to (a) or (b), they shall
be classified under the heading which occurs last in the numerical order
among those which equally merit consideration.”
Before we advert to this core issue, let us understand what
constitutes LCDs and its functions, with adequate clarity.
In Bloomsbury Dictionary of 'Science for Everyone', LCD and LED (light
emitting diode) are described in the following manner:
“LCD AND LED
The two principal methods of forming number sand letters on instruments
such as calculators and digital watches. A basic pattern of seven bars is
used to form the digits 0 to 9 and several letters. To form other letters
and symbols, more than seven bars are required.
In the LED (light-emitting diode), the bars are made of a substance that
permits an electric current to flow through in one direction only. A
substance used in this way is called a diode. As the current flows, the
diode gives off red, blue, yellow, or other coloured light, depending on
the compound of which it is made. For example, gallium phosphide (GaP)
emits a green glow. Electric circuits in the instrument selectively turn
on the current to the bars to form the various numbers and letters.
In the LCD (liquid crystal display), the bars are made of liquid crystals.
These are a kind of hybrid material, not quite a liquid and not quite a
solid. They can't be poured readily, as with liquids, nor are their
molecules locked in place, as with true solids. But the molecules can be
rotated slightly by an electric current. When no current flows, the bars
are not noticeable, because they reflect light to the same extent as the
rest of the display surface. But when a current flows through a bar, its
molecules rotate and its ability to reflect light is reduced. That bar
appears darker than the area around it and forms part of a number or
letter.
You can produce a similar darkening effect, called polarization, with
Polaroid sunglasses. Hold the glasses several centimeters from one eye and
look through one lens at a shiny, sunlit surface. Rotate the lens and
observe the darkening.
Liquid crystals can be made to order to do a particular job. For example,
one kind of crystal is sensitive to slight temperature changes. It is used
in thermometers where the number representing the temperature appears, then
disappears, to be succeeded by a higher or lower number as the temperature
changes.”
The basic pattern of digits or letters which is formed in
these LCDs is as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
a c e f h I j l p u
As is clear from the above, in the LCD the bars are made of
liquid crystals which are neither liquid nor solid entirely, but a hybrid
material of the two. The molecules are rotated slightly by electric
current making a particular bar darker than the area around it thereby
forming part of a number or letter.
Keeping in mind the aforesaid nature of product in question, we revert to
the tariff entries. It cannot be disputed that LCDs are specifically
provided in tariff item 9013. The only condition is that such LCDs should
not constitute 'articles' provided more specifically in other headings. In
the present case, it is also not in dispute that LCDs imported by the
appellant did not constitute any such 'article' which is more specifically
provided in other headings. On the contrary, the Revenue wants to include
in the same Chapter, i.e. Chapter 90, though under Entry 9028.90.10 as
“parts and accessories”. The only reason for including the goods under
Chapter Heading 9028 is that the LCDs were to be used in the electricity
supply meters. However, Entry 9028 does not pertain to LCDs but gas,
liquid, etc. and includes electricity supply meters as well. Merely
because these LCDs are to be used as parts in the said electricity supply
meters, can it be said that they are to be included in Entry 9028? Here,
Note 2 of this Chapter Notes becomes important since LCDs are used in the
electricity supply meters only as parts thereof.
Note 2(a) stipulates that parts and accessories which are goods
included in the heading of the said Chapter, i.e. Chapter 90, are to be
classified in their respective headings. Going by the plain reading of
Note 2(a) it is clear that LCDs, which are goods and are used as parts in
the final product mentioned in Chapter 90, namely, electricity supply
meters, are to be classified in its respective heading. Respective heading,
which is specifically provided, is 9013.
It was sought to be argued by Ms. Kiran Suri that as per Note 2(b), when
these LCDs are used solely for particular instrument, namely, electricity
supply meter, it has to be classified with the said meter and, therefore,
Chapter Entry 9028 would get attracted. However, this argument loses sight
of the fact that Note 2(b) relates to 'other parts and accessories',
namely, it would apply to those parts and accessories for which Note 2(a)
is inapplicable. Once we find that in the present case Note 2(a) squarely
applies, the irresistible conclusion is that the goods will be classified
in tariff item 9013, which is the specific heading for these goods.
In Collector of Central Excise v. Delton Cables Ltd. & Anr.[3], this Court
has held, while interpreting Notes 2(a) and 2(b) of Chapter Heading 85,
which is virtually to the same effect, that Note 2(b) would apply only if
the items in question were not specifically classifiable under their
respective headings. Para 4 of the said judgment, to this effect, reads as
under:
“4. It is clear from a reading of the two clauses to the section note that
clause (b) would only apply once it was found that the items in question
were not specifically classifiable under their respective headings. As has
been clearly said by the Collector (Appeals)
“from the sequence of the paragraphs given under Section Note 2 it is clear
that the question of switching over to Section Note 2(b) can arise only
after ensuring that the parts are not covered by Section Note 2(b) [sic
Section Note 2(a)] which begins with the expression “other parts” meaning
thereby that the parts which are not covered by Section Note 2(a) would be
considered for coverage by Section Note 2(b). One cannot therefore
directly jump over to Section Note 2(b) without exhausting the possibility
of Section Note 2(a).”
The aforesaid view of ours gets strengthened from Part-III of Chapter Notes
to Chapter 90. We may mention here that after studying the Chapter Notes,
Note 2 whereof is reproduced above, there are certain guidelines provided
under the caption 'General'. Part-I thereof deals with General Content and
Arrangement of the Chapter; Part-II deals with Incomplete or Unfinished
Machines, Apparatus, etc.; and Part-III deals with Parts and Accessories.
We are reproducing here this portion in order to show how it supports the
view which we have proposed to take as indicated above:
“(III) PARTS AND ACCESSORIES
Subject to Chapter Note 1, parts or accessories identifiable as suitable
for use solely or principally with the machines, appliances, instruments or
apparatus of this Chapter are classified with those machines, appliances,
etc.
This general rule does not, however, apply to:
(1) Parts or accessories which in themselves constitute articles falling
in any particular heading of this Chapter or of Chapter 84, 85 or 91 (other
than the residual heading 84, 85, 85.48 heading 84.14; transformers,
electro-magnets, capacitors, resistors, relays, lamps or valves, etc.,
remain classified in Chapter 85; the optical elements of heading 90.01 or
90.02 remain in the headings cited regardless of the instruments or
apparatus to which they are to be fitted; a clock or watch movement is
always classified in Chapter 91; a photographic camera falls in heading
90.06 even if it is of a kind designed for use with another instrument
(microscope, stroboscope, etc.)
(2) Parts or accessories suitable for use with several categories of
machines, appliances, instruments or apparatus falling in different
headings of this Chapter are classified in heading 90.33, unless they are
in themselves complete instruments, etc., specified in another heading (see
paragraph (1) above).”
This contains a general explanation to Chapter Note 2 and mentions that
where parts or accessories identifiable as suitable for use solely or
principally with the machines, appliances, etc., they are to be classified
with those machines/appliances. However, what is important is that
immediately thereafter it is clarified that this general rule would not
apply in certain circumstances. Sub-para of the above takes things beyond
the pale of any doubt by making it crystal clear that those parts and
accessories which in themselves constitute 'article' falling in any
particular heading of this Chapter, the general rule will not apply and
said article would fall in that particular heading. To demonstrate this,
examples which are given, eminently fit into the case at hand.
The aforesaid view of ours gets further cemented on going through
Explanatory Notes issued by the World Customs Organization. Volume 4 of
the Second Edition (1996), which covers Chapters 85-97, contains
explanatory note in respect of item mentioned at 90.13, with which we are
directly concerned herein. Relevant portion thereof reads as under:
“90.13 – LIQUID CRYSTAL DEVICES NOT CONSTITUTING ARTICLES PROVIDED FOR MORE
SPECIFICALLY IN OTHER HEADINGS: LASERS, OTHER THAN LASER DIODES; OTHER
OPTICAL APPLIANCES AND INSTRUMENTS, NOT SPECIFIED OR INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN
THIS CHAPTER.
|9013.10 |- |Telescopic sights for fitting to |
| | |arms; periscopes; telescopes |
| | |designed to form parts of machines, |
| | |appliances, instruments or apparatus|
| | |of this Chapter or Section XVI |
| | | |
|9013.20 |- |Lasers, other than laser diodes |
| | | |
|9013.80 |- |Other devices, appliances and |
| | |instruments |
| | | |
|9013.90 |- |Parts and accessories |
In accordance with Chapter Note 5, measuring or checking optical
appliances, instruments and machines are excluded from this heading and
fall in heading 90.31. Chapter Note 4, however, classifies certain
refracting telescopes in this heading and not in heading 90.05. It should,
moreover, be noted that optical instruments and appliances can fall not
only in headings 90.01 to 90.12 but also in other headings of this Chapter
(in particular, heading 90.15, 90.18 or 90.27). This heading includes:
(1) Liquid crystal devices consisting of a liquid crystal layer sandwiched
between two sheets or plates of glass or plastics, whether or not fitted
with electrical connections, presented in the piece or cut to special
shapes and not constituting articles described more specifically in other
headings of the Nomenclature.
xx xx xx”
As per this, LCD would be covered by 'other devices'
mentioned in 9013.80. That is precisely the case of the appellant.
The upshot of the aforesaid discussion leads to the conclusion that the
view taken by the Tribunal in the impugned judgment is unsustainable in
law. We, thus, allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the authorities
below and hold that LCDs imported by the appellant were classifiable under
Chapter Heading 9013.80.
.............................................J.
(A.K. SIKRI)
.............................................J.
(ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)
NEW DELHI;
MAY 05, 2015.
-----------------------
[1]
1997 (94) ELT 543
[2] (2005) 3 SCC 51
[3] (2005) 12 SCC 284