M.K.UTTHAN SUDHAR SAMITI MARYADIT Vs. BABULALSHUKLA & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4081 of 2016, Judgment Date: Apr 18, 2016
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4081 OF 2016
[@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 28479 OF 2010]
M.K.UTTHAN SUDHAR SAMITI MARYADIT Appellant(s)
VERSUS
BABULALSHUKLA & ORS. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to
go into the various factual aspects. The limited grievance of the
appellant is that though the High Court initially had taken a view, while
issuing notice, that the appellant will be heard at the time of disposal of
the Civil Revision Petition, but finally, by the impugned order, its
application for intervention was rejected.
3. Having heard the learned counsel on both the sides, we are of the
view that in the interest of justice, the intervention application of the
appellant should be allowed and the appellant should also be permitted to
participate in the proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
4. The appellant shall also be permitted to participate in the Civil
Revision Petition No. 414 of 2004 pending before the High Court. We
request the High Court to expedite the disposal of the petition.
5. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to
costs.
.......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J.
[ R. BANUMATHI ]
New Delhi;
April 18, 2016.