HITEN PRASAN DALAL Vs. C.B.I.
Supreme Court of India
Appeal (Crl.), 369 of 1999, Judgment Date: Jul 23, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 369 OF 1999
Hiten Prasan Dalal ..Appellant
versus
Central Bureau of Investigation ..Respondent
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 372 OF 1999
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 405 OF 1999
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 410 OF 1999
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 411 OF 1999
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 412 OF 1999
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 413 OF 1999
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 414 OF 1999
O R D E R
These bunch of cases, are in respect of different transactions.
The allegations against the accused are, however, of a similar nature. In
the general conspiracy, the main accused Harshad Mehta died before the
trial, which he was facing, concluded. We are informed by learned counsel,
that a few matters of the like nature, have been adjudicated upon by this
Court, wherein the accused-appellants have been acquitted. In other
matters, while maintaining the conviction of the accused, this Court, while
examining the quantum of sentence, has held, that the same needed to be
modified, to the period already undergone by them. In this behalf, learned
counsel for the rival parties have invited our attention to Ram Narayan
Popli vs. Central Bureau of Investigation 2003 (3) SCC 641, and S. Mohan
vs. Central Bureau of Investigation 2008 (7) SCC 1.
It is also pointed out by the learned counsel, that the
appellants in this case are brokers and/or bank employees. The transactions
in question pertain to the early 1990's. And as such, according to learned
counsel, it would suffice, if while maintaining their conviction, their
sentence is altered to the period already undergone by them.
Since it is pointed out, that the appellants herein were not
the main accused, and since they have faced investigation and trial for
about two and a half decades, we are satisfied, that ends of justice would
be met if, while maintaining the appellants conviction, their sentence is
modified to the period already undergone. Ordered accordingly. The fine,
if any, imposed shall however remain payable.
The appeals stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
….....................J.
[JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR]
NEW DELHI; ….....................J.
JULY 23, 2015. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 409 OF 1999
Abhay Dharamshi Narottam ..Appellant
versus
Central Bureau of Investigation ..Respondent
O R D E R
It is brought to our notice, that the appellant – Abhay
Dharamshi Narottam has died.
In view of the above, the appeal abates, and is dismissed as
such.
….....................J.
[JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR]
NEW DELHI; ….....................J.
JULY 23, 2015. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL]
ITEM NO.104 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Criminal Appeal No(s). 369/1999
HITEN PRASAN DALAL Appellant(s)
VERSUS
C.B.I. Respondent(s)
(with appln(s) for permission to replace the volumes 3 to 13 in place of
old volumes 3 to 13 filed on 4.4.2001 and permission to place additional
documents on record, directions, permission to file additional documents
and office report)
WITH
Crl.A. No. 372/1999
Crl.A. No. 405/1999
Crl.A. No. 409/1999
Crl.A. No. 410/1999
Crl.A. No. 411/1999
Crl.A. No. 412/1999
Crl.A. No. 413/1999
Crl.A. No. 414/1999
(with appln(s) for permission to replace the volumes 3 to 13 in place of
old volumes 3 to 13 filed on 4.4.2001 and permission to place additional
documents on record, directions, permission to file additional documents
and office report)
Date : 23/07/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
For Appellant(s) Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Adv.
for Mrs V. D. Khanna,AOR
Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Adv.
Ms. Jentiben AO, Adv.
for M/s. K. J. John & Co.
Ms. Radha Rangaswamy,AOR
Mr. R. C. Kohli,Adv.(AC)
Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv.
for Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan,AOR
Mr. Kartik Bhatnagar, Adv.
Ms. Khushboo Bari, Adv.
for Mrs. Nandini Gore,AOR
Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Adv.
Mr. Neel Kamal Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Nipun Goel, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG
Mr. Karan Seth, Adv.
for Ms. Sushma Suri,AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The appeals except Criminal Appeal No. 409/1999 stand disposed
of in terms of the signed order.
Criminal Appeal No. 409/1999 stands abated in terms of the
signed order.
(Renuka Sadana) (Parveen Kr. Chawla)
Court Master AR-cum-PS
[Two Signed Orders are placed on the file]