GENERAL MANAGER.R.B.I Vs. N.VENKATESHAIAH & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 30412 of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 02, 2016
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.........OF 2016
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 30412 OF 2010)
GENERAL MANAGER.R.B.I ...APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
N.VENKATESHAIAH & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO.........OF 2016
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 32134-32142 OF 2010)
CIVIL APPEAL NO.........OF 2016
(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 32143-32144 OF 2010)
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The dispute in these appeals arose in the background of the
supersession of two Co-operative Banks in the State of Karnataka, one Grain
Merchants Co-operative Bank and the other Kannika Parameshwari Co-operative
Bank. The supersession of the Board of the Managing Committee was pursuant
to a written requisition made by the Reserve Bank of India, under Section
30(5) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 which reads as
follows:
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Registrar shall, in
the case of a co-operative bank, if so required in writing by the Reserve
Bank of India in public interest or for preventing the affairs of the co-
operative bank being conducted in a manner detrimental to the interest of
the depositors or for securing the proper management of the co-operative
bank, by order in writing, remove the committee of that co-operative bank
and appoint an administrator to manage the affairs of the co-operative bank
for such period as may, from time to time, be specified by the Reserve Bank
of India.
Thus in terms of the above provision, the Registrar of the Cooperative
Societies is bound to supersede the Managing Committee of the Co-operative
Bank when a requisition is made by the Reserve Bank of India in writing.
3. Supersession was subject matter of challenge before the High
Court. In the impugned judgment dated 20th April, 2010 at paragraph 17,
the High Court has taken the view that a pre-decisional hearing by the
Reserve Bank of India is mandatory.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that
during the pendency of the appeals before this Court, elections to the
Managing Committee have been held twice and, therefore, is not necessary
for this Court to go into the question of law. Shri Jaideep Gupta, learned
senior counsel for the Reserve Bank of India also submitted that in view of
the intervening developments reported above, the appeals can be disposed of
leaving the question of law open. Therefore, the question whether a pre-
decisional hearing is required before the Reserve Bank of India before
making a requisition in writing to the Registrar of the Co-operative
Societies for supersession of the Managing Committee of a Cooperative Bank
under Section 30(5) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 is
left open to be decided in an appropriate case where the situation so
warrants. Needless also to say that the impugned judgment will not be
treated as a precedent.
5. The appeals are disposed of in the above terms.
….................J.
[KURIAN JOSEPH]
NEW DELHI ….….................J.
2nd FEBRUARY, 2016 [ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN]