Dr. Pawan Tamrakar and another vs. M.P. Special Police Establishment & others
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988
Section 13 - Criminal misconduct by a public servant
Section 420 - Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 7496 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2021
Law laid down -
1. Law relating to clubbing of FIRs - There can be no straightjacket formula for consolidating or clubbing the FIR and Courts are required to examine the facts of each case. A second FIR in respect of same offence or different offences committed in the course of same transaction is not permissible. The second FIR on the basis of receipt of information in respect of same cognizable offence or the same occurrence or incident giving rise one or more cognizable offences is not permissible. It is also settled that the Courts are required to draw a balance between the fundamental rights of the citizens under Article 19 & 21 of the Constitution and expansive power of the police to investigate a cognizable offence. In a given case, second or successive FIR for same or connected cognizable offence alleged to have been committed in the course of the same transaction in respect of which earlier FIR is already registered, may furnish a ground for interference by the Court but where the FIRs are based upon the separate incident or similar or different offences or the subsequent crime is of such magnitude that it does not fall within the ambit and scope of the earlier FIR then the second FIR can be registered. Where two incidents took place at different point of time or involve different person or there is no commonality and the purpose thereof is different and the circumstances are also different then there can be more than one FIR. The Court is required to see the circumstances of a given case indicating proximity of time, unity or proximity of case, continuity of action, commonality of purpose of the crime to ascertain if more than one FIR can be allowed to stand.
2. Subsequent FIRs for different offences committed in the course of same transaction or offences arising as a consequence of prior offence is not permissible but the second complaint in regard to the same incident filed as a counter complaint as also the second FIR for the same nature of offence against same accused persons lodged by different person or containing the different allegation is permissible.
Dr. Pawan Tamrakar and another vs. M.P. Special Police Establishment & others