DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SURESH KUMAR NANGIA AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 12075 of 2016, Judgment Date: Dec 14, 2016
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.12075 OF 2016
[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 36627 OF 2016 ]
[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. NO.23517/2016]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
SURESH KUMAR NANGIA AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by
judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave
Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising out
of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015.
4. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
5. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant
is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section
24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land
Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of
the acquisition proceedings afresh.
6. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are
initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a
Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession,
shall return the physical possession of the land to the owner.
7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
8. No costs.
.......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J.
[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]
NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 14, 2016.