DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. POONAM BHATIA & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4800 of 2016, Judgment Date: May 03, 2016
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4800 OF 2016
(Arising out of SLP ( C) No. 30195 of 2015)
Delhi Development Authority ...Appellant
Versus
Poonam Bhatia & Ors. ...Respondents
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The Delhi Development Authority has come up in appeal, aggrieved by
the Judgment dated 11.11.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi, whereby
the acquisition of the property referred to in the Judgment in question of
the land belonging to the respondents has been declared to have lapsed in
view of the provisions of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation
and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,
2013.
3. On the finding that the possession has not been taken, the relevant
portion of the impugned judgment is extracted below:
“It is an admitted position that neither physical possession of the subject
land has been taken by the land acquiring agency, nor has any compensation
been paid to the petitioners. The award was made more than five years
prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act. All the ingredients of section
24(2) of the 2013 Act as interpreted by the Supreme Court and this Court in
the following decisions satisfied.....”
4. In the above circumstances, the appellant having not disputed the
question of possession, before the High Court, there is no justification in
filing the appeal before this Court.
5. The appeal is hence dismissed. No costs.
................J.
[KURIAN JOSEPH]
....................J.
[ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN]
NEW DELHI;
MAY 03, 2016