DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. MOHD. JAMEEL & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5422 of 2017, Judgment Date: Apr 18, 2017
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5422 OF 2017
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 3828 OF 2017 ]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s)
VERSUS
MOHD. JAMEEL & ORS. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Despite findings regarding lapse, the party-respondents have
submitted that since the land has been utilized for a public purpose, they
would be satisfied with compensation worked out under The Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013.
3. Admittedly, no compensation has been paid either to the original
owner(s) or to the alleged subsequent purchaser(s). Therefore, this case
is covered by Delhi Development Authority Vs. Sukhbir Singh & Ors. Reported
in 2016 (8) SCALE 655.
4. The only direction issued by the High Court, however, in the
peculiar facts of the case, is to work out the compensation under the 2013
Act and disburse the same within the stipulated time.
5. We see no reason to interfere with the just order passed by the High
Court on the fair submission made by the respondents. The appeal is,
hence, dismissed. The appellant is granted six months' time to work out
the compensation and disburse the same in terms of the impugned order.
No costs.
.......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J.
[ R. BANUMATHI ]
New Delhi;
April 18, 2017.