DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. AMAN AND ORS

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Appeal (Civil), 10413 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2016

                                                              NON-REPORTABLE

                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10413 OF 2016
              [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 32064 OF 2016 ]
          [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC NO. 20164 OF 2016 ]


      DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY                        Appellant(s)

                                   VERSUS

      AMAN & ORS.                                       Respondent(s)

                                    WITH

                       CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10414 OF 2016
              [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 32065 OF 2016 ]
          [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC NO. 20437 OF 2016 ]

                                    WITH

                       CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10415 OF 2016
              [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 32066 OF 2016 ]
          [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC NO. 20526 OF 2016 ]

                                    WITH

                       CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10416 OF 2016
              [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 32067 OF 2016 ]
          [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC NO. 20649 OF 2016 ]

                               J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.
1.    Delay condoned.
2.    Leave granted.
3.     The  issue,  in  principle,  is  covered  against  the  appellant  by
judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016  arising  out  of  Special  Leave
Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising  out
of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015.
4.    These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
5.    In the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, the  appellant
is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under  Section
24(2)  of  the  Right  to  Fair  Compensation  and  Transparency   in   Land
Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,  2013  for  initiation  of
the acquisition proceedings afresh.
6.    We make it clear that in case no  fresh  acquisition  proceedings  are
initiated within the said period  of  one  year  from  today  by  issuing  a
Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if  in  possession,
shall return the physical possession  of  the  land  to  the  original  land
owner.
      Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
      No costs.
                                                   .......................J.
                                                     [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]

                                                   .......................J.
                                             [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]

      New Delhi;
      October 27, 2016.