Judgments - Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SAMPATH KUMAR VS. AYYAKANNU AND ANR.
Tags Land And Disputes
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PARVEEN MEHTA VS. INDERJIT MEHTA
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GANANATH PATTNAIK VS. STATE OF ORISSA
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
OM PRAKASH GUPTA VS. RANBIR B. GOYAL
Tags Tenancy
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
G.V.N. KAMESWARA RAO VS. G. JABILLI
Tags Divorce
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SAVITRI PANDEY VS. PREM CHANDRA PANDEY
Tags Divorce
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S M. M. T. C. LTD. & ANR. Vs. M/S MEDCHL CHEMICALS & PHARMA P. LTD. & ANR.
Tags Dishonour Of Cheque
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
K.N. BEENA Vs. MUNIYAPPAN AND ANOTHER.
Tags Dishonour Of Cheque
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S. BHASKAR INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. M/S. BHIWANI DENIM & APPARELS LTD. ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
HITEN P. DALAL Vs. BRATINDRANATH BANERJEE
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SYED SALEEMUDDIN Vs. DR.RUKHSANA & ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CHETAN DASS VS. KAMLA DEVI
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Hirachand Srinivas Managaonkar vs Sunand
Tags Divorce
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD. Vs. M/S.GALAXY TRADES & AGENCIES LTD. & ORS.
Tags Dishonour Of Cheque
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PADMJA SHARMA VS. RATAN LAL SHARMA
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S. SIL IMPORT, USA Vs. M/S. EXIM AIDES SILK EXPORTERS, BANGALORE
Tags Dishonour Of Cheque
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
BHARAT BARREL AND DRUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY Vs. AMIN CHAND PAYRELAL
Supreme Court of India
MANSUKHLAL VITHALDAS CHAUHAN Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
From a perusal of Section 6, it would appear that the Central or the State Government or any other authority (depending upon the category of the public servant) has the right to consider the facts of each case and to decide whether that "public servant" is to be prosecuted or not. Since the Section clearly prohibits the Courts from taking cognizance of the offences specified therein, it envisages that Central or the State Government or the "other authority" has not Full Judgment