Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1587 OF 2014
Judgment Date: Jul 31, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.(s) 1564 OF 2014
Judgment Date: Jul 25, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1277
of 2014, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 747 OF 2010
Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 831 OF 2014
Judgment Date: Apr 07, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 696 OF 2014
of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 28, 2014
7. In so far as the offence under Section 7 is concerned, it is a settled position in law that demand of illegal gratification is sine qua non to constitute the said offence and mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute the offence under Section 7 unless it is proved beyond all reasonable doubt that the accused voluntarily accepted the money knowing it to be a bribe.
Mere possession and recovery of the currency notes from the accused without proof of demand Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1310 OF 2010
Judgment Date: Mar 27, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 686
of 2013, Judgment Date: Mar 27, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.517 OF 2014
Judgment Date: Feb 28, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 503 OF 2014
Judgment Date: Feb 26, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 456 OF 2014
Judgment Date: Feb 19, 2014
The competent authority to give previous sanction is the authority competent to remove one from service. No doubt the appointing authority is the authority competent to remove him from service.
The Statute is very clear that the authority competent to remove an officer from service is the authority to give sanction for prosecution. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 943
of 2008, Judgment Date: Feb 05, 2014
The Special Judge appointed under Section 3(1) could exercise the
powers under sub-section (3) to Section 4 to try non-PC offence. Therefore,
trying a case by a Special Judge under Section 3(1) is a sine-qua-non for
exercising jurisdiction by the Special Judge for trying any offence, other
than an offence specified in Section 3. “Trying any case” under Section
3(1) is, therefore, a jurisdictional fact for the Special Judge Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 943
of 2008, Judgment Date: Feb 05, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2100
of 2013, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2013
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2118
of 2013, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2013
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5634
of 2008, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2013
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11176
of 2013, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2013
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2114,2115,2116
of 2013, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2013
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Writ Petition (Crl.), 120
of 2012, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2013
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 552
of 2011, Judgment Date: Dec 17, 2013
Full Judgment
