Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE REVENUE DIV. OFFICER FORT KOCHI &ORS Vs. JALAJA DILEEP & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 2749 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAJ KUMAR RANA Vs. RITA RATHORE

Appeal (Civil), 6161 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MD.ALI @ GUDDU Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 2238 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VIJAY PAL Vs. STATE(GNCT)OF DELHI

Appeal (Crl.), 2153 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HARMONY INNOVATION SHIPPING LTD. Vs. GUPTA COAL INDIA LTD. AND ANR

Appeal (Civil), 610 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S.PREMIER BREVERIES LTD.KARNATAKA Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

Appeal (Civil), 1569 of 2007, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

GURJIT SINGH @ GORA & ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 519 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SATISH KUMAR JAYANTI LAL DABGAR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Appeal (Crl.), 230 of 2013, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NAGRAJ Vs. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.N.

Appeal (Crl.), 1311 of 2006, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

D. VELAYUTHAM Vs. STATE REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Appeal (Crl.), 787 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

He has admitted the receipt of the bribe amount. The only effort at proving his innocence has been the submission that receipt of the entire sum was on behalf of Accused 1, no part of which was demanded by Accused 2 for his own keeping and consumption. This Court has ratiocinated in significant length and detail on the nature of evidence commonly encountered in trap cases Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT.LTD.& ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5099 of 2008, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DEEPAK Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 65 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JIBAN KRISHNA MONDAL & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6373 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ARUNBHAI KALYANBHAI SUTARIYA Vs. NUTAN NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.& ANR

Appeal (Civil), 2822 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

V.KRISHNASWAMY & ANR. Vs. KARNATAKA RAJYA KAIGARIKA SAHAKARI &ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 2874 - 75 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHAMMED HUSSAIN WAREKAR Vs. U.O.I. & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 37 of 2013, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ST.MARY'S HOTEL(P) LTD.& ANR Vs. KOTTAYAM DIST.COOP.BANK LTD.& ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 367 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANIL JOSHI & ORS. Vs. STATE OF H.P.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6097-6100 of 2009, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

U.O.I & ORS Vs. GURDAYAL SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 2865-2866 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. RAM PAL

Appeal (Crl.), 393 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2015

Only question raised for consideration is whether the sentence imposed in the facts and circumstances is fair and just. Moreover, in an appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution, this Court does not re-appreciate the evidence, in absence of perversity or patent legal error, merely because a different view was also possible. We are thus, not inclined to reopen Full Judgment