Judgments - Supreme Court of India
THE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE Q BRANCH CID THOOTHUKUDI Vs. MARIYA ANTON VIJAY
INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHTS SOCIETY LTD. Vs. SANJAY DALIA & ANR
STATE OF M.P. Vs. ASHOK & ORS.
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. SATEESH & OR.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR. Vs. PANNALAL CHOUDHURY & ANR.
QUANTUM SECURITIES PVT LTD AND ORS Vs. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Vs. M/S. SANDAN VIKAS (I) LTD.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. MAHENDRA NATH SHARMA
20. The antiquated notion of pension being a bounty a gratuitous payment depending upon the sweet will or grace of the employer not claimable as a right and, therefore, no right to pension can be enforced through court has been swept under the carpet by the decision of Full Judgment
RAHUL YADAV & ANR. Vs. M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.
PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS REGUL.BOARD Vs. INDRAPRASTHA GAS LTD.& ORS.
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ETC. Vs. RAJUBHAI SOMABHAI BHARWAD & ANR. ETC.
STATE OF M.P. Vs. MADANLAL
STATE OF KERALA & ORS Vs. A.P MAMMIKUTTY
A.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD. Vs. MATETI S.V.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. CHAUDHARI RAN BEER SINGH AND ANR.
JAGTAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
INDRA DALAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the courts have resorted to the dictionary meaning and explained that incriminating statements by the accused to the police suggesting the inference of the commission of the crime would amount to confession and, therefore, inadmissible under this provision. It is also defined to mean Full Judgment
PREM SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
Insofar as circumstances leading to connecting the appellant with the said murder are concerned, following evidence has come on record: (i) Brother of the deceased i.e. PW-9 had seen the appellant working in the fields which are adjacent to the fields of victim's family where Sunita had gone to collect Barseem. (ii) The appellant was keeping an evil eye on the deceased. (iii) The sickle, weapon used in the murder, Full Judgment
BIJENDRA BHAGAT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
According to the witnesses these two accused were also armed with country made pistols. The injuries suffered by the deceased are incised wounds and one fire arm injury. However, none of the injuries on the person of the deceased could be attributed to the lathi which was supposedly in the hands of the appellant. Undoubtedly, three injuries on the person Full Judgment