Judgments - Supreme Court of India
JAGDISH CHAND SHARMA Vs. NARAIN SINGH SAINI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ORS
14. As would be evident from the contents of Section 63 of the Act that to execute the Will as contemplated therein, the testator would have to sign or affix his mark to it or the same has to be signed by some other person in his presence and on his direction. Further the signature or mark of the testator or the signature of the person signing for him has to be so Full Judgment
RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD Vs. NEW PINK CITY NIRMAN SAHKA.SAM.LD.& ANR.
M/S ARIANE ORGACHEM PVT.LTD. Vs. WYETH EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS
“When a question of law is raised for the first time in a court of last resort, upon the construction of a document, or upon facts either admitted or proved beyond controversy, it is not only competent but expedient, in the interests of justice, to entertain the plea.” Therefore, with regard to the above mentioned aspect regarding the plea of the competency of the Deputy Labour Commissioner to pass an Full Judgment
KHUB RAM Vs. DALBIR SINGH & ORS.
Mr. Patwalia has rightly placed reliance to support the aforesaid submissions, on a judgment of this Court in the case of Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy (2010) 8 SCC 383. The law relating to effect of fraud upon a competent authority to get an appointment/office as well as effect of fraud upon court has been discussed in detail in paragraphs 28 to 36 Full Judgment
M/S. ESCORTS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD
PRADIP NANJEE GALA Vs. SALES TAX OFFICER & ORS.
The question raised before us is whether the respondent-Revenue could resile from a settlement entered into with the assessee on the basis of which the appellant has already paid and settled his dues under the Act. “In a Taxing Act one has to look merely at what is clearly said. There is no room for any intendment. There is no equity about a tax. There Full Judgment
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Vs. C. L. VIMALA & ORS.
it is the prerogative of the Creditor alone whether he would move against the principal debtor first or the surety, to realize the loan amount. “Therefore, the creditor has a right to obtain a decree against the surety and the principal debtor. The surety has no right to restrain execution of the decree against him until the creditor has exhausted his remedy against the principal debtor Full Judgment
T. VASANTHAKUMAR Vs. VIJAYAKUMARI
GOLBAR HUSSAIN & ORS. Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & ANR.
STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE T.N. Vs. MANIKANDAN & ORS.
VIPUL KUMAR @ VIPULESH Vs. STATE OF CHATTISGARH
VIPUL KUMAR @ VIPULESH Vs. STATE OF CHATTISGARH
VIPUL KUMAR @ VIPULESH Vs. STATE OF CHATTISGARH
K. ANBAZHAGAN Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
We are called upon in this appeal to decide whether the 4th respondent was authorised to represent the case of the prosecution in the High Court of Karnataka in the appeals filed by the accused persons against their conviction by the Special Court, and if he was not so authorised, whether Full Judgment