Judgments - Supreme Court of India
STATE OF U.P. Vs. SATVEER & ORS.
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. SATEESH & OR.
STATE OF M.P. Vs. ASHOK & ORS.
In the light of the eye witness account and the post mortem report it is quite clear that the respondents were present when Tikaram was burning alive. The sequence of narration certainly shows that they were waiting in ambush. It may be that only two of them set Tikaram afire but the others definitely ensured by surrounding Tikaram that he would not be allowed to escape. Further, throwing of burning Full Judgment
KAMLA KANT DUBEY Vs. STATE OF U.P.& ORS.
It is settled principle that a conviction can well be founded on the testimony of a single witness if the court finds his version to be trustworthy and corroborated by record on material particulars[1]. We are conscious that we are considering an appeal against acquittal and that going by the law laid down by this Court, the Full Judgment
STATE OF J & K Vs. WASIM AHMED MALIK @ HAMID & ANR.
The language used as a means of communication between the confessing accused and the recording officer being Hindi or Hindustani, such recording of confession in Hindi language is completely in conformity with the Full Judgment
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. Vs. MANINDRA KUMAR
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. Vs. SODHAN DAIBAGANS AND ANR.
THE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE Q BRANCH CID THOOTHUKUDI Vs. MARIYA ANTON VIJAY
INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHTS SOCIETY LTD. Vs. SANJAY DALIA & ANR
STATE OF M.P. Vs. ASHOK & ORS.
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. SATEESH & OR.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR. Vs. PANNALAL CHOUDHURY & ANR.
QUANTUM SECURITIES PVT LTD AND ORS Vs. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Vs. M/S. SANDAN VIKAS (I) LTD.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. MAHENDRA NATH SHARMA
20. The antiquated notion of pension being a bounty a gratuitous payment depending upon the sweet will or grace of the employer not claimable as a right and, therefore, no right to pension can be enforced through court has been swept under the carpet by the decision of Full Judgment