Judgments - Supreme Court of India
DAYA SAH & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA DATT PANDE & ORS.
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS
Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant- Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment
C.C.E. MUMBAI - IV Vs. M/S. FITRITE PACKERS, MUMBAI
M/S STAR INDUSTRIES Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORTS) RAIGAD
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND C.E.NAGPUR Vs. M/S. ISPAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Vs. NORTHERN INDIAN GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD.
RAMESH CHAND DEAD THROUGH LRS. Vs. ASRUDDIN(DEAD) THR LRS. & ANR.
STATE THR. INT. OFF., NARCOTICS CON.BUR. Vs. MUSHTAQ AHMAD ETC.
JAGDISH LAL GAMBHIR Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.
NEON LABORATORIES LTD. Vs. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. & ORS
SATYA PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS
“whether the appellant herein, being the father of the deceased, has statutory right to prefer an appeal to the High Court against the order of acquittal under proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. without obtaining the leave of the High Court as required under sub-Section (3) to Section 378 of Cr.P.C.”, this Court is of the view that the right of questioning Full Judgment
PURNIMA MANTHENA & ANR. Vs. DR. RENUKA DATLA & ORS.
DINESH LAL Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ECC CONST.GRP. Vs. C.C.E, HYDERABAD
VIJAY KUMAR AGARWAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
When the order of suspension is revoked and the suspended employee is asked to join the duty, he is required to do so. How the period of suspension is to be treated is another aspect. At the most, such an employee would be entitled to full salary during the suspension period if no order is passed as to how the suspension period would be governed. That would not Full Judgment
PUKHREM SHARATCHANDRA SINGH Vs. MAIREMBAM PRITHVIRAJ @ PRITHIBIRAJ SINGH
STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD Vs. RABO BANK
SUDHIR Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, and after considering the gravity of the offence, circumstances of the case, particularly, the allegations of corruption and misappropriation of public funds released for rural development, and further considering the conduct of the appellants and the fact that the investigation is held up as the custodial interrogation of the appellants could not be done due to Full Judgment