Judgments - Supreme Court of India
INDIAN RARE EARTHS LTD. Vs. UNIQUE BUILDERS LTD.
M/S JAPAN AIRLINES CO.LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI
M/S. SWASTIKA ENTERPRISES & ANR. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, KOLKATA & ORS.
MOHAN SINGH & ORS Vs. THE CHAIRMAN RAILWAY BOARD & ORS
PARHLAD AND ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA
RAMESH KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
In normal circumstances when retrospective promotions are effected, all benefits flowing therefrom, including monetary benefits, must be extended to an employee who has been denied promotion earlier. The principle of “no work no pay” would not be attracted where the respondents were in fault in not considering the case of the appellant for promotion and not allowing Full Judgment
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
PEERAPPA HANMANTHA HARIJAN(D) BY LRS.&OR Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
SHABINA ABRAHAM & ORS. Vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS
M/S. POONAM SPARK (P) LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M/S. N.S. RATHNAM & SONS
RAJESHWAR BABURAO BONE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
RAJENDRA SHANKAR SHUKLA AND ORS. ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATISGARH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
V.K.MISHRA & ANR. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.
Court cannot suo moto make use of statements to police not proved and ask question with reference to them which are inconsistent with the testimony of the witness in the court. The words in Section 162 Cr.P.C. “if duly proved” clearly show that the record of the statement of witnesses cannot be admitted in evidence straightway nor can be looked into but they Full Judgment