Judgments - Supreme Court of India
DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. Vs. INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORP.& ORS
The issue falling for consideration is whether minutes of meeting can override statutory regulations. Article 77 of the Constitution of India deals with the conduct of business of Government of India while Article 166 of the Constitution of India deals with the conduct of business of the Government of Full Judgment
JYOTI LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. BHARAT J. PATEL & OTHERS
The maintainability of a suit is question of law. Though, by virtue of declaration under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, all suits of civil nature are maintainable unless barred either by an express provision or by implication of law. We are of the opinion that the directions in paras 7.2 and 7.3 are inconsistent with the directions in para 7.4. Apart from Full Judgment
TATA STEEL LTD Vs. UOI & ORS
The appeals are disposed of as above. The question for our consideration in the set of appeals filed by Tata Steel is whether royalty is chargeable under Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Second Schedule thereto on raw or unprocessed or Run-of-Mine (ROM) coal at the pit-head or is it chargeable on coal after it is processed and Full Judgment
M. MAHENDAR KUMAR Vs. M. MANI AND ORS
It was clearly on account of non application of mind to such relevant fact that the impugned order came to be passed at the initial stage of admission without noticing any counter affidavit or reply and/or its absence. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we are constrained to and hereby set aside the impugned order as it has Full Judgment
SURTI GUPTA Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. & ANR.
It has also been observed by the High Court for the purpose of calculation of future loss of dependency of the appellant that the deceased at the time of the accident on 10.7.1990 was drawing a salary of Rs.4,214/- per month and was 45 years of age. However, we are of the view that the salary of the deceased at the time of her death taken by the High Court Full Judgment
VESA HOLDINGS P.LTD.& ANR Vs. STATE KERALA & ORS.
R.DINESHKUMAR@DEENA Vs. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.
The question before the High Court was whether the Sessions Court was justified in declining to summon PW64 in exercise of its authority under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. as an additional accused in Sessions Case No.73 of 2009. It is the settled legal position that an offence of conspiracy[3] is complete the moment two or more persons agree to do an illegal act, or agree to Full Judgment
ABDUL RAZZAQ Vs. STATE OF U.P.
ABDUL RAZZAQ Vs. STATE OF U.P. For Details View PDF. Full Judgment