Judgments - Supreme Court of India
RAKESH MOHINDRA Vs. ANITA BERI & ORS.
VNS COLLEGE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. M/S.PREBON YAMANE (I) LTD.
S.E.B.I. AND ORS. Vs. ALLIANCE FINSTOCK LTD AND ORS.
U.P. POWER CORP. LTD. & ORS. Vs. VIMLA DEVI & ANR.
M/S. CHEBROLU ENTERPRISES Vs. A.P.BACKWARD CLASSES CO-OP FIN.CORP.LTD
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. MANOJ DESWAL & ORS.
Dr. SANDEEP SADASHIVRAO KANSURKAR & ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C. Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD & ANR.
ASHOK RANGNATH MAGAR Vs. SHRIKANT GOVINDRAO SANGVIKAR AND
RAJENDRA PRAKASH AGRAWAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
SANT RAM Vs. DHAN KAUR & ORS.
It is a settled principle of law that only those issues could be given up by the party which are the subject matter of the lis before the Court. Since in the petition before this Court, the issue with regard to award of mesne profits at the rate of 30/- p.m. was not the subject matter at the instance of any party to the lis, the question of Full Judgment
VEERENNDRA KUMAR DUBEY Vs. CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF & ORS
The first and foremost is an unequivocal declaration that mere award of four red ink entries to an individual does not make his discharge mandatory. This implies that four red ink entries is not some kind of laxman rekha, which if crossed would by itself render the individual concerned undesirable or unworthy of retention in the force. Award of four red ink entries simply pushes the individual concerned into a grey area where Full Judgment
C. CHAKKARAVARTHY & ORS. Vs. TMT. M. SATYAVATHY, I.A.S., & ORS.
The question that fell for consideration therein was whether the practice adopted by the Government of Pondicherry of counting the service of Section Officers/Junior Engineers who have qualified as graduates while in service only from the date they passed the degree or equivalent examination for purposes of promotion to the post of Assistant Engineers under Rule 11(1) of the Government of Pondicherry Assistant Full Judgment
BALU @ BAL SUBRAMANIAM & ANR. Vs. STATE (U.T. OF PONDICHERRY)
To invoke Section 34 IPC, it must be established that the criminal act was done by more than one person in furtherance of common intention of all. It must, therefore, be proved that:- (i) there was common intention on the part of several persons to commit a particular crime and (ii) the crime was actually committed by Full Judgment