Judgments - Supreme Court of India
NEERU YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANR.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RAMLAL DEVAPPA RATHOD & ORS
STATE OF U.P. Vs. RAGHUNANDAN @ BADE MALI & ORS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RAMLAL DEVAPPA RATHOD & ORS
CHINTAMAN NAMDEV PATIL (DEAD) Vs. SUKHDEV NAMDEV PATIL & ANR
DELHI DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR
SAMAR PAL SINGH Vs. CHITRANJAN SINGH
U.O.I & ANR Vs. M.P TRADING & INVESTMENT RAC. CORP. LTD
RAM HARI MHATRE Vs. MAHADEO BALU MHATRE & ORS
JAI MAHAL HOTELS PVT. LTD. Vs. RAJKUMAR DEVRAJ & ORS.
SHARADAMMA Vs. MOHAMMED PYREJAN(D) TR.LRS.& ANR
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. PRAKASH @ GAJENDRA
Simpliciter, it has been observed that a careful scrutiny of the entire evidence has been made but we find from the judgment that no such exercise has been done. Mere statement in the judgment to that effect is not enough. Evidence is not only required to be mentioned in the judgment but its evidentiary value has to be assessed carefully. Full Judgment
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE Vs. M/S. G.M. EXPORTS & ORS.
The question of law which arises in the instant appeals is whether anti-dumping duty imposed with respect to imports made during the period between the expiry of the provisional anti-dumping duty and the imposition of the final anti-dumping duty is legal and valid. Full Judgment
INTERNL.ADV.RES.CEN.FOR P.M.& N.M.& ORS. Vs. NIMRA CERGLASS (P) LTD.& ANR.
The legal position is well-settled that when a prosecution at the initial stage is asked to be quashed, the test to be applied by the court is, as to whether uncontroverted allegations as made in the complaint establish the offence. The High Court being superior court of the State should refrain from analyzing the materials which are yet to be adduced and seen in their true perspective. The Full Judgment