Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AVENUE SUPERMARTS PVT. LTD. Vs. NISCHINT BHALLA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8397 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TPT CORPN. Vs. ALEXIX SONIER & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 2967 of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NARAYAN LAXMAN PATIL Vs. M/S GALA CONSTRUCTION CO.P.LTD.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8399 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAM BAHAL & ANR. Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3594 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India

YELLAPU UMA MAHESWARI & ANR Vs. BUDDHA JAGADHEESWARARAO & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 8441 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. F.NATARAJ

Appeal (Crl.), 1439 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

In the present case, the gaps in the evidences of the prosecutrix and the medical officer make it highly improbable that sexual intercourse took place. It would be erroneous to rely upon such discrepant testimonies and convict the accused. It can thus be stated with certitude that the solitary evidence of the prosecutrix, in absence of any corroboration by the medical evidence, is not of such quality which can be Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

D.THAMODARAN Vs. KANDASAMY & ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 341 of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DAYA SAH & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA DATT PANDE & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4747-4749 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 8314 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant- Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Supreme Court of India

C.C.E. MUMBAI - IV Vs. M/S. FITRITE PACKERS, MUMBAI

Appeal (Civil), 2733 of 2007, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S STAR INDUSTRIES Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORTS) RAIGAD

Appeal (Civil), 6088 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND C.E.NAGPUR Vs. M/S. ISPAT INDUSTRIES LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 637 of 2007, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Vs. NORTHERN INDIAN GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 8378 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAJNIKANT OJHA Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 7147 of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India

RAMESH CHAND DEAD THROUGH LRS. Vs. ASRUDDIN(DEAD) THR LRS. & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 8427 of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE THR. INT. OFF., NARCOTICS CON.BUR. Vs. MUSHTAQ AHMAD ETC.

Appeal (Crl.), 1294-1295 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAGDISH LAL GAMBHIR Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6975 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NEON LABORATORIES LTD. Vs. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 1018 of 2006, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SATYA PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 1315 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015

“whether the appellant herein, being the father of the deceased, has statutory right to prefer an appeal to the High Court against the order of acquittal under proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. without obtaining the leave of the High Court as required under sub-Section (3) to Section 378 of Cr.P.C.”, this Court is of the view that the right of questioning Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PURNIMA MANTHENA & ANR. Vs. DR. RENUKA DATLA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8275 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2015

Full Judgment