Judgments - Supreme Court of India
AVENUE SUPERMARTS PVT. LTD. Vs. NISCHINT BHALLA & ORS.
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TPT CORPN. Vs. ALEXIX SONIER & ANR.
NARAYAN LAXMAN PATIL Vs. M/S GALA CONSTRUCTION CO.P.LTD.& ORS.
RAM BAHAL & ANR. Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION & ORS.
YELLAPU UMA MAHESWARI & ANR Vs. BUDDHA JAGADHEESWARARAO & ORS
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. F.NATARAJ
In the present case, the gaps in the evidences of the prosecutrix and the medical officer make it highly improbable that sexual intercourse took place. It would be erroneous to rely upon such discrepant testimonies and convict the accused. It can thus be stated with certitude that the solitary evidence of the prosecutrix, in absence of any corroboration by the medical evidence, is not of such quality which can be Full Judgment
D.THAMODARAN Vs. KANDASAMY & ANR
DAYA SAH & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA DATT PANDE & ORS.
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS
Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant- Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment
C.C.E. MUMBAI - IV Vs. M/S. FITRITE PACKERS, MUMBAI
M/S STAR INDUSTRIES Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORTS) RAIGAD
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND C.E.NAGPUR Vs. M/S. ISPAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Vs. NORTHERN INDIAN GLASS INDUSTRIES LTD.
RAMESH CHAND DEAD THROUGH LRS. Vs. ASRUDDIN(DEAD) THR LRS. & ANR.
STATE THR. INT. OFF., NARCOTICS CON.BUR. Vs. MUSHTAQ AHMAD ETC.
JAGDISH LAL GAMBHIR Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.
NEON LABORATORIES LTD. Vs. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LTD. & ORS
SATYA PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS
“whether the appellant herein, being the father of the deceased, has statutory right to prefer an appeal to the High Court against the order of acquittal under proviso to Section 372 of Cr.P.C. without obtaining the leave of the High Court as required under sub-Section (3) to Section 378 of Cr.P.C.”, this Court is of the view that the right of questioning Full Judgment