Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI Vs. M/S. SANDAN VIKAS (I) LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 9730 of 2003, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. MAHENDRA NATH SHARMA

Appeal (Civil), 1123 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

20. The antiquated notion of pension being a bounty a gratuitous payment depending upon the sweet will or grace of the employer not claimable as a right and, therefore, no right to pension can be enforced through court has been swept under the carpet by the decision of Full Judgment

Tags Pension
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAHUL YADAV & ANR. Vs. M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4909 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS REGUL.BOARD Vs. INDRAPRASTHA GAS LTD.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4910 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ETC. Vs. RAJUBHAI SOMABHAI BHARWAD & ANR. ETC.

Appeal (Civil), 1310-1311 of 2014, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF M.P. Vs. MADANLAL

Appeal (Crl.), 231 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF KERALA & ORS Vs. A.P MAMMIKUTTY

Appeal (Civil), 1640 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

A.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD. Vs. MATETI S.V.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Appeal (Civil), 10643-10644 of 2010, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. Vs. CHAUDHARI RAN BEER SINGH AND ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 697 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAGTAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 86 of 2013, Judgment Date: Jun 19, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Conviction
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

INDRA DALAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 1261 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

The word 'confession' has no where been defined. However, the courts have resorted to the dictionary meaning and explained that incriminating statements by the accused to the police suggesting the inference of the commission of the crime would amount to confession and, therefore, inadmissible under this provision. It is also defined to mean Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PREM SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 569 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

Insofar as circumstances leading to connecting the appellant with the said murder are concerned, following evidence has come on record: (i) Brother of the deceased i.e. PW-9 had seen the appellant working in the fields which are adjacent to the fields of victim's family where Sunita had gone to collect Barseem. (ii) The appellant was keeping an evil eye on the deceased. (iii) The sickle, weapon used in the murder, Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BIJENDRA BHAGAT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Appeal (Crl.), 2202 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 29, 2015

According to the witnesses these two accused were also armed with country made pistols. The injuries suffered by the deceased are incised wounds and one fire arm injury. However, none of the injuries on the person of the deceased could be attributed to the lathi which was supposedly in the hands of the appellant. Undoubtedly, three injuries on the person Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHABNAM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Writ Petition (Crl.), 88 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 27, 2015

The present writ petitions are filed on the allegations that on 21.05.2015, death warrants have been issued by the learned Sessions Judge, which are impermissible inasmuch as various remedies which are available to the convicts, even after the dismissal of the appeals by this Court, are still open and yet to be exercised by them. It is submitted that these convicts can file review petition seeking review of Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Sandeep and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Appeal (Crl.), 1554 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 26, 2015

The incompatibility or inconsistency can be said to arise if the assertions in one dying declaration are so diametrically opposed to the statements in the other that both cannot stand together. 21. In view of the above, the law on the issue of dying declaration can be summarised to the effect that in case the court comes to the conclusion that the dying declaration is true and reliable, has been recorded Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.L BAKOLIA Vs. STATE TH. DIRECTOR,C.B.I.

AA, 797 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

For coming to the finding of guilt for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, firstly, there must be a demand and secondly, there must be acceptance in the sense that the accused received illegal gratification. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PREM RAM Vs. M.D. UTTARAKHAND PEY JAL & NIRM.NIGM&ORS

Appeal (Civil), 4474 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

If engagement in a work- charged establishment rest on a criterion, no better than the absolute discretion of the authority engaging them or the fortuitous circumstances of a vacancy or need in a work-charged establishment, then, there is indeed no difference between a daily-wager on the one hand and work-charged employees on the other. No distinction can resultantly be Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CANARA BANK & ANR. Vs. M. MAHESH KUMAR

Appeal (Civil), 260 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Common question of law falling for consideration in these civil appeals is whether the dependant family members of the deceased employee of the appellant-Canara Bank were entitled to seek compassionate appointment on the basis of ‘Dying in Harness Scheme’ which was passed Vide Circular No.154/1993 w.e.f. 8.05.1993. (i) Compassionate employment cannot be made in the absence of rules or regulations issued by the Government or a public authority. The request Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RANJEET KUMAR RAM @ RANJEET KUMAR DAS Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Appeal (Crl.), 1831 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAMANLAL & ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 2279 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015

Full Judgment