Judgments - Supreme Court of India
B.S. SHESHAGIRI SETTY & ORS. ETC. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. ETC.
SUMER BUILDERS PVT. LTD. Vs. NARENDRA GORANI
RATNESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY Vs. INDIRA GANDHI INST. OF M.S. PATNA & ORS.
PRAVEEN KUMAR SAI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
N.SUNKANNA Vs. STATE OF A.P.
The prosecution has not examined any other witness present at the time when the money was demanded by the accused and also when the money was allegedly handed-over to the accused by the complainant. The complainant himself had disowned his complaint and has turned hostile and there is no other evidence to prove that the accused had made any demand. In short there is no Full Judgment
SUNIL KUMAR & ETC. ETC. Vs. BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.
What was held, in our view, was that scaling is a method which was generally unsuitable to be adopted for evaluation of answer papers of subjects common to all candidates and that the application of the said method to the examination in question had resulted in unacceptable results. Holding of public examinations involving wide and Full Judgment
FARUK ILAHI TAMBOLI & ANR Vs. B.S.SHANKARRAO KOKATE(D) BY LRS.& ORS.
SANJIV RAJENDRA BHATT Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
AJITHKUMAR P AND ORS Vs. REMIN K R AND ORS
In view of the legal position enunciated by this Court in the aforesaid cases the conclusion is irresistible that a student who is entitled to be admitted on the basis of merit though belonging to a reserved category cannot be considered to be admitted against seats reserved for reserved category. It is application Full Judgment
ASGER IBRAHIM AMIN Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA
To summarise, normally, a belated service related claim will be rejected on the ground of delay and laches (where remedy is sought by filing a writ petition) or limitation (where remedy is sought by an application to the Administrative Tribunal). One of the exceptions to the said rule is cases relating to a continuing wrong. Where a service related claim is based on a continuing wrong, relief can be granted even if there is Full Judgment
HARYANA STATE IND. DEV. CORPORATION Vs. PRAN SUKH & ORS.
MAQSOOD & ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P.
OM PRAKASH SHARMA @ O.P.JOSHI Vs. RAJENDRA PRASAD SHEWDA & ORS.
VASANT BALU PATIL & ORS. Vs. MOHAN HARACHAND SHAH & ORS.
RAZIA AMIRALI SHROFF & ORS. Vs. M/S NISHUVI CORPORATION & ORS.
GOVT.OF A.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Vs. PRATAP KARAN & ORS.
DULU DEVI Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
mere passing of an order of dismissal or termination would not be effective unless it is published and communicated to the officer concerned. If the appointing authority passes an order of dismissal, but does not communicate it to the officer concerned, theoretically it is possible that unlike in the case on a judicial order pronounced in Court, the authority may change its mind and decide to modify its order. The order Full Judgment
M/S. SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF C.EXCISE & ORS.
the basic question of law which arises for consideration is as to whether or not the manufacturer/exporter is entitled to rebate of the excise duty paid both on the inputs and on the manufactured product, when excise duty is paid on a manufactured product and also on the inputs which have gone into manufacturing the product and such manufactured product is exported? The aforesaid discussion Full Judgment