Judgments - Supreme Court of India
SUDIP KR. SEN @ BILTU Vs. STATE OF W.B. & ORS.
AWADESH KUMAR JHA @ AKHILESH KUMAR JHA & ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
BHARAT MATRIMONY.COM PVT. LTD. Vs. PEOPLE INTERACTIVE (I) PVT. LTD.
COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-XVIII,DELHI Vs. BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
K.S. SANJEEV (DEAD) AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.
COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-XVIII,DELHI Vs. BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
DARSHAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
The word alibi means “elsewhere”. The plea of alibi is not one of the General Exceptions contained in Chapter IV of IPC. It is a rule of evidence recognized under Section 11 of the Evidence Act. However, plea of alibi taken by the defence is required to be proved only after prosecution has proved its case against the accused. In the present case said condition is fulfilled. Full Judgment
STATE OF A.P. Vs. PATCHIMALA VIGNESWARUDU @ VIGANNA
KRISHAN CHANDER Vs. STATE OF DELHI
it is clear that the High Court has recorded the concurrent findings on the charges framed against the Appellant in the impugned judgment and order. It has also failed to re-appreciate the evidence on record properly and consider the law on the relevant aspect of the case. Therefore, the said findings are not only erroneous in law but also suffer from error in law. Hence, the same is Full Judgment
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Vs. SANJAY KUMAR
Ramprasad and Another Versus Central Valuation Board & Others
Chandrapal Yadav Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others
SHIVANAGOWDA SHANKARGOUDA DESAI Vs. M. CHANNAVEERAPPA MODI (D) BY LRS.& ORS.
MALATI SARDAR Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
The question for consideration thus is whether the Tribunal at Kolkata had the jurisdiction to decide the claim application under Section 166 of the Act when the accident took place outside Kolkata jurisdiction and the claimant also resided outside Kolkata jurisdiction, but the respondent being a juristic person carried on business at Kolkata. Further question is whether in absence of Full Judgment