Judgments - Supreme Court of India
GOVT.OF A.P.TR.PRINL.SEC.& ORS. Vs. PRATAP KARAN & ORS.
DULU DEVI Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
mere passing of an order of dismissal or termination would not be effective unless it is published and communicated to the officer concerned. If the appointing authority passes an order of dismissal, but does not communicate it to the officer concerned, theoretically it is possible that unlike in the case on a judicial order pronounced in Court, the authority may change its mind and decide to modify its order. The order Full Judgment
M/S. SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF C.EXCISE & ORS.
the basic question of law which arises for consideration is as to whether or not the manufacturer/exporter is entitled to rebate of the excise duty paid both on the inputs and on the manufactured product, when excise duty is paid on a manufactured product and also on the inputs which have gone into manufacturing the product and such manufactured product is exported? The aforesaid discussion Full Judgment
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR Vs. R.K. ZALPURI AND ORS
AVENUE SUPERMARTS PVT. LTD. Vs. NISCHINT BHALLA & ORS.
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TPT CORPN. Vs. ALEXIX SONIER & ANR.
NARAYAN LAXMAN PATIL Vs. M/S GALA CONSTRUCTION CO.P.LTD.& ORS.
RAM BAHAL & ANR. Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION & ORS.
YELLAPU UMA MAHESWARI & ANR Vs. BUDDHA JAGADHEESWARARAO & ORS
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. F.NATARAJ
In the present case, the gaps in the evidences of the prosecutrix and the medical officer make it highly improbable that sexual intercourse took place. It would be erroneous to rely upon such discrepant testimonies and convict the accused. It can thus be stated with certitude that the solitary evidence of the prosecutrix, in absence of any corroboration by the medical evidence, is not of such quality which can be Full Judgment
D.THAMODARAN Vs. KANDASAMY & ANR
DAYA SAH & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA DATT PANDE & ORS.
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS
Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant- Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment