Judgments - Supreme Court of India
VIJAY LATKA & ANR. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS
R.RACHAIAH Vs. HOME SECRETARY, BANGALORE
The bare reading of Section 216 reveals that though it is permissible for any Court to alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced, certain safeguards, looking into the interest of the accused person who is charged with the additional charge or with the alteration of the additional charge, are also provided specifically under sub-sections (3) and 4 of Section 216 of the Code. Sub-section(3), in no Full Judgment
ALIGARH DEVT.AUTH. Vs. MEGH SINGH & ORS.
HEMANT MADHUSUDAN NERURKAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR.
MAMTA GOYAL Vs. RAMGOPAL
J.RAMESH KAMATH & ORS. Vs. MOHANA KURUP & ORS.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. MOHINUDDIN JAMAL ALVI & ANR.
M/S RAVI PRAKASH REFINERIES (P) LTD. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
SOORAJ KUMAR Vs. TAHSILDAR & ANR
AMBA BAI Vs. GURUSHANTHAMMA (D) BY LRS.& ORS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. POONAM BHATIA & ORS.
THOTA VENKATESWARA RAO Vs. THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS.
MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE & RES.CEN. & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
PATEL RAVJIBHAI BHULABHAI (D)THR. LRS. Vs. RAHEMANBHAI M.SHAIKH(D) THR. LR. & ORS.
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT CENTRAL Vs. SAURASTHRA CEMENT & CHEM. INDUSTRIES LTD
ARUN BABAN SAWANT Vs. SUREKHA KERU PIMPARKAR @ SUREKHA A. SAWANT
MOHAMMAD SADIQUE Vs. DARBARA SINGH GURU
SANKALP CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
As per the said Notifications, a common entrance test, i.e., National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) shall be held. It was further submitted, interalia, as follows : “1. AIPMT 2016 to be held on 1st May, 2016 shall be phase I of NEET. 2. Phase II of NEET for the left out candidates shall be held on 24th July, 2016 by inviting applications with fee. 3. Combined result of Full Judgment
VERHOEVEN, MARIE-EMMANUELLE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2. The principal question for consideration is whether there is a binding extradition treaty in terms of Section 2(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 between India and Chile. Our answer to this question is in the affirmative. 3. The subsidiary question, equally important, is assuming there is no binding extradition treaty between India and Chile, whether Full Judgment