Judgments - Supreme Court of India
M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. Vs. COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.RAIPUR
M/S ADANI AGRI FRESH LTD Vs. MAHABOOB SHARIF & ORS
OPG SECURITIES PRIVATE LTD. Vs. S.E.B.I. & ANR.
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD Vs. HILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT LTD
M/S. ADANI POWER LTD. Vs. GUJARAT ELECTY REG.COMMISSION & ORS.
VENNANGOT ANURADHA SAMIR Vs. VENNANGOT MOHANDAS SAMIR
UNION OF INDIA Vs. V. SRIHARAN @ ,MURUGAN & ORS.
PURUSHOTHAM Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
SUJOY MITRA Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Rajni Sanghi Versus Western Indian State Motors Ltd. & Ors.
LALARAM & ORS. Vs. JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH.& ANR.
POONA EMPLOYEES UNION Vs. FORCE MOTORS LIMITED & ANR.
NUNEY TAYANG Vs. KODELUM TAYANG & ORS
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. MEDICITI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (MIMS) AND ORS.
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Vs. NILOUFER SIDDIQUI & ORS.
MADAN RAZAK Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
S.E.B.I. Vs. MAGNUM EQUITY SERVICES LTD. & ORS.
D.N. JEEVARAJ Vs. CHIEF SEC., GOVT. OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
This Court has repeatedly held that where discretion is required to be exercised by a statutory authority, it must be permitted to do so. It is not for the courts to take over the discretion available to a statutory authority and render a decision. In the present case, the High Court has virtually taken over the function of the BDA by requiring it to take action against Sadananda Gowda and Full Judgment
STATE OF H.P.& ORS. Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR & ORS.
We make it clear that to maintain certainty in the judicial decision, we have to restrain from interfering with the decision of the High Court which has stood for a long period on the principle of stare decisis. However, the said principle will be applicable where the meaning of the Statute is ambiguous and capable of more interpretation than one. In Full Judgment