Judgments - Supreme Court of India
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Vs. ANITA & ANR ETC.
EXEC.ENGINEER, KUKADI P.L.D.DIV.& ANR. Vs. BHAGA PRABHU BHOSALE ETC.
CHUKA DEVI AND ORS. Vs. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
SECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. M/S OPEE STOCK-LINK LTD.& ANR
STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. JAYRAJBHAI PUNJABHAI VARU - Murder
10) The courts below have to be extremely careful when they deal with a dying declaration as the maker thereof is not available for the cross- examination which poses a great difficulty to the accused person. A mechanical approach in relying upon a dying declaration just because it is there is extremely dangerous. The court has to examine a dying Full Judgment
EXTRA JUDL.EXEC.VICTIM FAMILIES ASSN&ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
MEGHASHYAM SADASHIVRAO VADHAVE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
KRUSHNA NARAYAN WANJARI Vs. THE JAI BHARTI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, HINGANGHAT THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR.
VAISHALI SHRIDHAR JAGTAP Vs. SHRIDHAR VISHWANATH JAGTAP
SURINDERJIT SINGH MAND & ANR. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. - PIL
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. VISHAV PRIYA SINGH
GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED Vs. TARINI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.& ORS.
MUKHTIAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB - PC Act
It is a settled principle of law laid down by this Court in a number of decisions that once the demand and voluntary acceptance of illegal gratification knowing it to be the bribe are proved by evidence then conviction must follow under Section 7 of the PC Act against the accused. Indeed, these twin requirements are sine qua non for proving Full Judgment