Judgments - Supreme Court of India
RAJU CHAND Vs. THE ZONAL DIRECTOR NEHRU YUVA KENDRA SANGATHAN, CHANDIGARH & ORS.
JAWAHARLAL Vs. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR,H.C. OF KERALA&ORS.
NABAM REBIA AND ETC. ETC. Vs. DEPUTY SPEAKER AND ORS.- Power of Governor
137. As is evident from our constitutional history, there are three areas in which a Governor might function: Areas in which he can act only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. This is in all areas of the executive functions of the State Government [Article 166]. Areas in which he can act in his discretion by or under the Constitution and in which he Full Judgment
MANINDERJIT SINGH BITTA Vs. VIJAY CHHIBBER & ORS
AJAY KUMAR SINGH Vs. FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING & ORS.
M/S.NORTHERN COALFIELDS LTD. Vs. HEAVY ENGINEERING CORP.LTD. & ANR.
V. VASANTHAKUMAR Vs. H.C. BHATIA AND ORS
In view of cases pending in the Supreme Court of India on average for about 5 years, in the High Courts again for about 8 years, and anywhere between 5- 10 years in the Trial Courts on the average, would it not be part of the responsibility and duty of the Supreme Court of India to examine through a Constitution Bench, the issue of divesting the Supreme Court of about 80% of the pendency of Full Judgment
VELUGUBANTI HARI BABU Vs. PARVATHINI NARASIMHA RAO AND ANR.
RAKESH KUMAR Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. Vs. NIRMALABEN S. MEHTA & ANR. ETC.
M/S. WEXFORD FINANCIAL INC PANAMA Vs. BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.
MULIN SHARMA Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS
STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. Vs. M/S CWE-SOMA CONSORTIUM
TALAULICAR & SONS P.LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Vs. ANITA & ANR ETC.
EXEC.ENGINEER, KUKADI P.L.D.DIV.& ANR. Vs. BHAGA PRABHU BHOSALE ETC.
CHUKA DEVI AND ORS. Vs. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
SECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. M/S OPEE STOCK-LINK LTD.& ANR
STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. JAYRAJBHAI PUNJABHAI VARU - Murder
10) The courts below have to be extremely careful when they deal with a dying declaration as the maker thereof is not available for the cross- examination which poses a great difficulty to the accused person. A mechanical approach in relying upon a dying declaration just because it is there is extremely dangerous. The court has to examine a dying Full Judgment