Judgments - Supreme Court of India
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORS
PAWAN KUMAR AGGARWAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS
CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION Vs. U.O.I.& ORS.
STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Vs. M/S KERALA RARE EARTH & MINERALS LIMITED & ORS
MANISH KUMAR SUREKA Vs. WEST BENGAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. ETC.
NARAYAN Vs. BABASAHEB & ORS.
COMMISSIONER,DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX Vs. M/S ABB LTD.
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Based on the interpretation placed by us on Section 4A(4) of the MMDR Act, and Rule 28 of the Mineral Concession Rules, we can draw the following conclusions. Firstly, unless an order is passed by the State Government declaring, that a mining lease has lapsed, the mining lease would be deemed to be subsisting, up to the date of expiry of the Full Judgment
LILAWATI AGARWAL (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES &ANR Vs. T.K. KUNHIRAMAN & ORS.
LIC OF INDIA AND ORS Vs. KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA AND ANR ETC.
RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTT Vs. UTTARADI MUTT
A plain reading of Section 100 CPC makes it explicit that the High Court can entertain a second appeal if it is satisfied that the appeal involves a substantial question of law. More than a decade and a half back, in Ishwar Dass Jain v. Sohan Lal[3] it has been ruled that after the 1976 Amendment, it is essential Full Judgment
HARDEI Vs. STATE OF U.P.
It is well accepted in criminal jurisprudence that F.I.R. may not contain all the details of the occurrence or even the names of all the accused. It is not expected to be an encyclopedia even of facts already known. There are varities of crimes and by their very nature, details of some crimes can be unfolded only by a detailed and expert investigation. This is more true in crimes involving conspiracy, economic offences Full Judgment
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE Vs. M/S. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD.
PURPLE INDI HOLDINGS LTD. Vs. DRILLING &OFFSHORE PTE. LTD,
STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. Vs. BRIJESHWAR SINGH CHAHAL & ANR.
The question precisely is whether appointment of law officers by the State Governments can be questioned or the process by which such appointments are made, can be assailed on the ground that the same are arbitrary, hence, violative of the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 38. To sum up, the following propositions are legally Full Judgment
SAVELIFE FOUNDATION & ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
We also direct that the scheme framed by the Central Government and this order be widely published through electronic media and print media for the benefit of public so that public is made aware and that serves as impetus to good Samaritans to extend timely help and protection conferred upon them without incurring the risk of harassment. Full Judgment