Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 26024
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1266
of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3253
of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016
Fortunately for the
Appellant, because of the noise and disturbance, even the neighbours of the
Appellant rushed to help and the door of the bathroom was broken open and
the Respondent was saved. Had she been successful in her attempt to commit
suicide, then one can foresee the consequences and the plight of the
Appellant because in that event the Appellant would have Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2806
of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10084
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10010
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8334
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2016
It is significant that the Rules refer to the recruitment
year. It is a well-accepted principle of service law that only the number
of vacancies that are advertised can be filled up. If the advertisement
gives liberty to the Government to vary the number of posts, such power
cannot be exercised for filling up future vacancies. If additional posts
were created during the recruitment year i.e. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10019
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1516
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8245-8246
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1767
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2875-2879
of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 919
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
In Dhan Raj @ Dhand vs. State of Haryana (2014) 6 SCC 745, one
of us (Hon. Ghose,J.) while dwelling on the imperatives of circumstantial
evidence ruled that the same has to be of highest order to satisfy the
test of proof in a criminal prosecution. It was underlined that such
circumstantial evidence should establish a complete unbroken Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3797
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9934
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 2
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Writ Petition (Civil), 406
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1999-2000
of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1531-1533
of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 958
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2016
Full Judgment
