Judgments of Supreme Court of India

In my considered view the Rules and the instructions clearly demonstrate that there was no cut-off mark or pass mark for the viva voce examination in the past and therefore the High Court on 12.01.2015 made a specific Resolution that no one shall be declared passed and selected for appointment unless he secures minimum 40% in the Full Judgment

Tags Appointment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ASIKALI AKBARALI GILANI ETC Vs. NASIRHUSAIN MAHEBUBBHAI CHAUHAN & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 10122-10123 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags PIL

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE MADURAI CORPORATION Vs. P. KAYALVIZHI & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 10425 of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

ANIL HOBLE Vs. KASHINATH JAIRAM SHETYE AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 26024 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KAMTA YADAV & ORS. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Appeal (Crl.), 1266 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags Murder

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NARENDRA Vs. K.MEENA

Appeal (Civil), 3253 of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016

Fortunately for the Appellant, because of the noise and disturbance, even the neighbours of the Appellant rushed to help and the door of the bathroom was broken open and the Respondent was saved. Had she been successful in her attempt to commit suicide, then one can foresee the consequences and the plight of the Appellant because in that event the Appellant would have Full Judgment

Tags Cruelty Divorce

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S DUGAR TEA INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 2806 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags Interpretation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HIRAL P. HARSORA AND ORS. Vs. KUSUM NAROTTAMDAS HARSORA AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 10084 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags Domestic Violence Interpretation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

GOV.BODY,L.P SHAHI COLLEGE, PATNA & ANR Vs. SEEMA MISHRA AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 10010 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags Appointment Interpretation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANURAG KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8334 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 05, 2016

It is significant that the Rules refer to the recruitment year. It is a well-accepted principle of service law that only the number of vacancies that are advertised can be filled up. If the advertisement gives liberty to the Government to vary the number of posts, such power cannot be exercised for filling up future vacancies. If additional posts were created during the recruitment year i.e. Full Judgment

Tags Advertisement Appointment

Judgments - Supreme Court of India