Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10432
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 28, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10413
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2147
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10353
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Review Petition (Civil), 3538
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6673
of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4283-4284
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 213
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2016
Having traversed the legal parameters with reference to the
application of the principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’, in relation to
temporary employees (daily-wage employees, ad-hoc appointees, employees
appointed on casual basis, contractual employees and the like), the sole
factor that requires our determination is, whether the concerned employees
(before this Court), were rendering similar duties and responsibilities, as
were Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 7383
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 26, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 473
of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 24, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10313
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 24, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1718-1719
of 2001, Judgment Date: Oct 24, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4235
of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 463
of 2006, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016
It
has been held by this Court that judges need not be protected and that they
can take care of themselves. It is the right and interest of the public in
the due administration of justice that have to be protected. See Asharam M.
Jain v. A. T. Gupta, reported in (1983) 4 SCC 125. Vilification of judges
would lead to the destruction of the system of administration of justice.
The statements made by the Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10286
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 329
of 2005, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10237-38
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10237-38
of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1482
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 20, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1624-1625
of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 20, 2016
Full Judgment
