Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1096
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 28, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1218
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 28, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11359
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 28, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11337
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 28, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11247
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 25, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 298
of 2006, Judgment Date: Nov 25, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11259
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 25, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11582
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 25, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1141
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 24, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 8665-8668
of 2010, Judgment Date: Nov 24, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11584
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 24, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11120
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 23, 2016
The mere fact that a person has made a contradictory statement in a
judicial proceeding is not by itself always sufficient to justify a
prosecution under Sections 199 and 200 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of
1860) (hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”); but it must be shown that the
defendant has intentionally given a false statement Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11114-11119
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 23, 2016
The Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, having regard to the evidence,
had returned a finding on the nature of injury and the percentage of
disability. It is purely a question of fact. There is no case for the
insurance company that the finding is based on no evidence at all or that
it is perverse. Under Section 4(1)(c)(ii) of the Act, Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11256
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 23, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11257
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 23, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11258
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 23, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2526
of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1138-1139
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11236
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2016
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 11237
of 2016, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2016
Full Judgment
