Judgments - Supreme Court of India
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR HUDA & ANR. Vs. SHAKUNTLA DEVI
VED PRAKASH Vs. U.O.I. & ORS.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. NAGIN CHAND GODHA AND ORS.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RAN SINGH AND ORS
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SECRETARY LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND AN Vs. GOVIND RAM AND ANR.
ROBUST HOTELS(P) LTD.& ORS. Vs. E.I.H LIMITED & ORS.
S.D. BHOSKAR AND CO. AND ANR Vs. BANK OF BARODA AND ANR.
JORSINGH GOVIND VANJARI Vs. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, JALGAON DIVI
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. GEETA GULATI AND ORS.
MAHARAO BHIM SINGH THR.MAHARAO B.R.SINGH Vs. C.I.T.,JAIPUR
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. BHAG RATI & ORS.
JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL) AND ETC. ETC. Vs. CHERIAN EAPEN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
VASHRAMBHAI DHANABHAI VEGAD Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.
MAHENDRA CHANDRAHANSA SATAV (DEAD THROUGH LRS.) ETC.ETC. Vs. UDYAM VIKAS SAHAKARI BANK LTD & ORS ETC
RAM SWAROOP AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
HAMDARD LABORATORIES Vs. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND ORS.
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BD.OF INDIA Vs. BURREN ENERGY INDIA LTD.& ANR.
GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
There is thus neither any proximate nor remote acts of omission or commission on the part of the appellant and his family members that can be irrefutably construed to be a direct or indirect cause or factor compelling Surjit and her daughters to take the extreme step of self-elimination. It is thus manifest that the offence punishable is one of abetment of the commission of suicide by any person, predicating existence of a Full Judgment
GURPAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
Further, having regard to the root cause of the incident and the events that sequentially unfolded thereafter, we are of the comprehension that the appellant was overpowered by an uncontrollable fit of anger somuch so that he was deprived of his power of self-control and being drawn in a web of action reflexes, fired at the deceased and the injured, who were within his sight. The facts do not commend to Full Judgment