Judgments - Supreme Court of India
BABITA LILA & ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA
M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS(P) LTD. & ANR. Vs. ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
KADMANIAN @ MANIKANDAN Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. KUSHAM JAIN AND ANR.
ASHIQ HUSSAIN FAKTOO Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that the justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of Full Judgment
COMMNR.,CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS Vs. M/S. ADISON & CO. LTD.
BHARWAD NAVGHANBHAJ JAKSHIBHAI & ORS. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
M.P.STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. Vs. MANOJ KUMAR & ANR.
M/S PARK STREET PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD Vs. DIPAK KUMAR SINGH AND ANR
ALLAHABAD DEVT.AUTH. Vs. M/S THE GENERAL FIBRE DEALERS & ANR
VIVEK SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P & ANR
The High Court reiterated the settled position of law that reservation for the physically handicapped category was to be provided as a matter of law and that such reservation was to be made on the basis of total sanctioned strength and not on the basis of available vacancy of a recruitment year. We are satisfied that the reservation which must be provided for, as a Full Judgment
BRAJENDRA SINGH YAMBEM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
JAMSHED ANSARI Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD & ORS.
SOUREN PAL AND ORS Vs. PRABHAT BOURI AND ORS
State of Haryana Vs Ram Mehar & Others Etc. Etc.
The decisions of this court when analysed appositely clearly convey that the concept of the fair trial is not in the realm of abstraction. It is not a vague idea. It is a concrete phenomenon. It is not rigid and there cannot be any strait- jacket formula for applying the same. On occasions it has the necessary flexibility. Full Judgment