Judgments - Supreme Court of India
RAJENDER BANSAL & ORS. Vs. BHURU (D) THR. LRS. & ORS
VATSALA SHENOY Vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LANCO ANPARA POWER LTD. Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS
VIKAS SANKHALA & ORS ETC Vs. VIKAS KUMAR AGARWAL & ORS ETC
THE ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PORT BLAIR AND Vs. M/S SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LTD AND ANR
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. DEVESH CHHABRA AND ORS
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS
SUNHERI AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
SUKHWANT KAUR AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. USHA DEVI AND ORS.
TIN PLATE DEALERS ASSN. P. LTD. & ORS. Vs. SATISH CHANDRA SANWALKA & ORS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs. M/S MEGHMANI ORGANICS LTD.& ORS
SALAM SAMARJEET SINGH Vs. HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL AND ANR
In my considered view the Rules and the instructions clearly demonstrate that there was no cut-off mark or pass mark for the viva voce examination in the past and therefore the High Court on 12.01.2015 made a specific Resolution that no one shall be declared passed and selected for appointment unless he secures minimum 40% in the Full Judgment
ASIKALI AKBARALI GILANI ETC Vs. NASIRHUSAIN MAHEBUBBHAI CHAUHAN & ORS
THE MADURAI CORPORATION Vs. P. KAYALVIZHI & ANR
ANIL HOBLE Vs. KASHINATH JAIRAM SHETYE AND ORS
KAMTA YADAV & ORS. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
NARENDRA Vs. K.MEENA
Fortunately for the Appellant, because of the noise and disturbance, even the neighbours of the Appellant rushed to help and the door of the bathroom was broken open and the Respondent was saved. Had she been successful in her attempt to commit suicide, then one can foresee the consequences and the plight of the Appellant because in that event the Appellant would have Full Judgment