Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MEHMOODA GULSHAN Vs. JAVAID HUSSAIN MUNGLOO

Appeal (Civil), 1398-1399 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2017

Whether the requirement of the landlord for own occupation could also mean occupation by a member of the family, in this case, the son, is the short question arising for consideration. The premises sought to be evicted is not held for the benefit of the son alone; but the whole family. It is for the own occupation of the landlord. It has been established in the facts of this case that the landlord was not happy and Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT) - I Vs. A.P. MOLLER MAERSK A/S/

Appeal (Civil), 8040 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 17, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Appeal (Crl.), 240 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ASHA RANJAN Vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

Writ Petition (Crl.), 132 of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SARDAR NIHAL SINGH & ANR. Vs. JAT DHARAMSHALA SAMITI, HARIDWAR & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 1595 of 2007, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH Vs. M/S. STESALIT LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 4507 of 2004, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

FATEH SINGH (D) THR. LRS. Vs. HARI CHAND & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 11337 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 300 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VARUN KUMAR GUPTA Vs. OM PRAKASH

Appeal (Civil), 3420-3421 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHIVAKUMAR M. Vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BMTC

Appeal (Civil), 2828 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M. THANGAVEL Vs. R. PALANI

Appeal (Civil), 2565-2566 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MAHENDRA POPATLAL SHAH & ANR. Vs. M/S. JETHANAND & SONS

Appeal (Civil), 3580 of 2006, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ORISSA INDUSTRIAL INFRA.DEV. CORPORATION Vs. M/S MESCO KALINGA STEEL LTD. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2545 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DILIP MALLICK Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Appeal (Crl.), 130 of 2012, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ARJUN AND ANR. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Appeal (Crl.), 206-207 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH Vs. M/S. STESALIT LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 4507 of 2004, Judgment Date: Feb 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Nidhi Kaim and another Vs State of Madhya Pradesh and others

Appeal (Civil), 1727 of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017

Besides, the consideration recorded by us, in the foregoing paragraphs, we may confess, that we felt persuaded for taking the view that we have, for a very important reason – national character. There is a saying – when wealth is lost, nothing is lost; when health is lost, something is lost; but when character is lost, Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Reshma Anil Bhosale Vs Maharashtra State Election Commission & Others

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 3350 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017

The remedy under Article 136 is a discretionary remedy though it does not mean that the discretion should be exercised whimsically. The elections in question pertain to a local body under a local law of the State Legislature. The result of the election is most unlikely to have any effect on the affairs of this nation. We are even inclined to believe that the result of the election would not have any repercussions Full Judgment

Tags Election
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VIVEK SINGH Vs. ROMANI SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 3962 of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KUYADAT ALI AND ORS. Vs. STATE OF U.P AND ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 321 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017

Full Judgment