Judgments - Supreme Court of India
MEERA SANTOSH PAL AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The crucial consideration in the present case is whether the right to bodily integrity calls for a permission to allow her to terminate her pregnancy. The report of the Medical Board clearly warrants the inference that the continuance of the pregnancy involves the risk to the life of the pregnant woman and a possible grave injury to her physical or mental health as required by Section 3 (2)(i) of Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. K.P. SINGH AND ANR.
SHRI KAILASH VIJAYVARGIYA Vs. ANTAR SINGH DARBAR AND ORS
UNITED FINANCE CORPORATION Vs. M.S.M. HANEEFA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
SALONI ARORA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the parties on the strength of law laid down by this Court in the case of Daulat Ram vs. State of Punjab, (AIR 1962 SC 1206) that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered Full Judgment
TUPPADAHALLI ENERGY INDIA PVT LTD Vs. KARNATAKA ELEC. REG. COMM. & ANR
SRI GANESH Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
“Age determination inquiry” contemplated under Section 7-A of the Act read with Rule 12 of the 2007 Rules enables the court to seek evidence and in that process, the court can obtain the matriculation or equivalent certificates, if available. Only in the absence of any matriculation or equivalent certificates, the court needs to obtain the date of birth certificate from the Full Judgment
MD. SAJJAD @ RAJU @ SALIM Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The identification parade itself was held 25 days after the arrest. Their chance meeting was also in the night without there being any special occasion for them to notice the features of any of the accused which would then register in their minds so as to enable them to identify them on a future date. The chance meeting was also for few Full Judgment
AJAY SINGH AND ANR AND ETC. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANR
Performance of judicial duty in the manner prescribed by law is fundamental to the concept of rule of law in a democratic State. It has been quite often said and, rightly so, that the judiciary is the protector and preserver of rule of law. Effective functioning of the said sacrosanct duty has been entrusted to the judiciary and that entrustment expects the courts to conduct Full Judgment
THE STATE OF TELANGANA Vs. HABIB ABDULLAH JEELANI & ORS.
The seminal issue that arises for consideration in this appeal, by special leave, is whether the High Court while refusing to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to interfere in an application for quashment of the investigation, can restrain the investigating agency not to arrest the accused persons during the course of investigation. There Full Judgment
KESHAV ARJUN CHARANIA Vs. INDIRA KESHAV CHARANIA
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Vs. TUHIN SULTAN MALLICK AND ORS
COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE Vs. M/S.UNITED SPIRITS LTD.& ANR.
In view of the aforesaid analysis, we are constrained to remit the matter to the tribunal for reconsideration of the aforesaid aspects on the basis of observations made hereinabove and the law in the field. However, we may proceed to state that we have not expressed anything on the merits of the case including the imposition of penalty and interest. We expect the tribunal shall advert to each Full Judgment
SECRETARY MAHATAMA GANDHI MISSION & ARN. Vs. BHARTIYA KAMGAR SENA AND ORS
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SECRETARY, LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANR. Vs. GAUTAM CHOPRA & ORS.
GAUTAM JAIN Vs. U.O.I.& ANR.
This provision commands communication of the grounds on which the order of detention has been passed and to afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order. In the instant case, the documents containing the statement of Pooran Chand Sharma were not given and for this very reason, the High Court rightly held that such a ground cannot be relied upon by the respondents in support Full Judgment