Judgments - Supreme Court of India
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. ETC. Vs. MOHINDER SINGH & ORS. ETC.
HARYANA URBAN DEV. AUTHORITY & ORS. Vs. ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS P.LTD.
GANGA RAM SAH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR. Vs. ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRS. & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. M. SELVAKUMAR & ANR.
When the attempts of Physically Handicapped candidates of OBC Category and Physically Handicapped candidates of General Category, who appeared in the Civil Services Examination are made equal, and a Physically Handicapped candidate belonging to OBC Category, in addition to 10 years relaxation in age also enjoys 3 years more age relaxation for appearing in the examination, we cannot agree with Full Judgment
KULDEEP SINGH PATHANIA Vs. BIKRAM SINGH JARYAL
ASHA BHIKANRAO SONEWANE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
RISHABH CHOUDHARY Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
S.SREEDHAR REDDY & ORS. Vs. GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS.
D.M.,ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SWAPNA NAYAK & ORS
AGYAPAUL SINGH Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA (SAMB)
RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU Vs. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)
The chain leading to the sole conclusion that it is the accused persons and nobody else who had committed the crime is not established by the three circumstances set forth above, even if all of such circumstances are assumed to be proved against the accused. Reliance has also been placed on the decision of this Court in the case of Sanwat Khan and Anr. vs. State Full Judgment
STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Vs. NIKHIL RANJAN CHAKRABORTY & ORS.
The law is thus clear that a candidate has the right to be considered in the light of the existing rules, namely, “rules in force on the date” the consideration takes place and that there is no rule of absolute application that vacancies must invariably be filled by the law existing on the date when they arose. As against the case of total exclusion and Full Judgment