Judgments - Supreme Court of India
SURAJ PAL (D) THR. LR. Versus RAM MANORATH & ORS.
M/s. Sunder Marketing Associates versus State of Haryana & Ors.
J. Vasanthi & Ors. VERSUS N. Ramani Kanthammal (D) Rep. by LRs. & Ors.
Union of India and Ors. Versus Ex LAC Nallam Shiva
To put it differently, in the fact situation of the present case, it is not possible to hold that the punishment of dismissal was vindictive, unduly harsh or disproportionate to the offence committed by the respondent and especially after the Tribunal has positively concluded that failure of the respondent to communicate either to his unit or to the nearest military stationf or around 1½ years was uncondonable. Ordinarily, the Tribunal ought not to interfere with the order of punishment except Full Judgment
K. NAVEEN KUMAR VERSUS COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER & ANR.
Vasant Rao Guhe VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh
Trial Court on the two major heads of income i.e. pay and agricultural earnings, the learned Trial Court not only of its own embarked on an inquiry to ascertain and compute the figures, it wholly resorted to inferences in calculating the pay for the periods omitted by the prosecution as well as in fixing 60% expenditure from pay towards household needs. Its assessment of agricultural income of the appellant to say the least is also wholly presumptive in absence of Full Judgment
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND VERSUS MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS.
DR. ABHINAV GUPTA VERSUS PROF. G.K. MEHTA ERSTWHILE VICE CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD
SUHAS RAMCHANDRA APTE VERSUS VASANTRAO SHANKARRAO BHOSLE (D) THR. LRS.
ASHA EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. VERSUS NANDKISHORE SHRIKRISHNA WANKHEDKAR AND ANR.
PRAVEER KUMAR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT. OF U.P. & ORS. VERSUS REENA KUMARI & ORS.
U. Manjunath Rao Versus U. Chandrashekar & Anr.
State through Central Bureau of Investigation Versus Dr. Anup Kumar Srivastava
Framing of charge is the first major step in a criminal trial where the court is expected to apply its mind to the entire record and documents placed therewith before the court. Taking cognizance of an offence has been stated to necessitate an application of mind by the court but framing of charge is a major event where the court considers the possibility of discharging the accused of the offence with which he is charged or requiring the accused to face trial. There are different categories Full Judgment