Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Writ Petition (Civil), 114
of 2014, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 253
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017
A perusal of the above provision makes it clear that if the elements of any of the three sub-clauses are met, the same would be sufficient to constitute an offence of ‘criminal misconduct’ under Section 13(1)(d). Undoubtedly, all the three wings of clause (d) of Section 13(1) are independent, alternative and disjunctive. Thus, under Section 13(1)(d)(i) obtaining any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage by corrupt or illegal means by a public servant in itself would amount to criminal misconduct. On Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 251
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017
The essential ingredients of the offence of criminal conspiracy are: (i) an agreement between two or more persons; (ii) the agreement must relate to doing or causing to be done either (a) an illegal act; or (b) an act which is not illegal in itself but is done by illegal means. It is, therefore, plain that meeting of minds of two or more persons for doing or causing to be done an illegal act or an act by illegal means Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10002
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, 2
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Writ Petition (Civil), 502
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 01, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1292
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 01, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 7023
of 2012, Judgment Date: Aug 01, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1261-1262
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 01, 2017
While the bar against cognizance of a specified offence is mandatory, the same has to be understood in the context of the purpose for which such a bar is created. The bar is not intended to take away remedy against a crime but only to protect an innocent person against false or frivolous proceedings by a private person. The expression “the public servant or his administrative superior” cannot exclude the High Court. It is clearly implicit in the direction of Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Writ Petition (Civil), 411
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 01, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1298
of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 01, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Transfer Petition (Civil), 567
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 31, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Special Leave Petition (Civil), 18336
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1242
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1053
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1265
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9831-32
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1918
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9836
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Transfer Case (Civil), 169
of 2006, Judgment Date: Jul 26, 2017
Full Judgment
