Judgments - Supreme Court of India
STATE OF H.P. Vs. NIRMALA DEV
SARYUG SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. Vs. NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION AND ORS.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. Vs. DIWAN CHAND ETC. ETC
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. NISAR RAMZAN SAYYED
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Vs. HINDUSTAN SAFETY GLASS WORKS LTD
When a claim is made by the insured that itself is actionable. There is no question of requiring the insured to approach a court of law for adjudication of the claim. This would amount to the encouraging avoidable litigation which certainly cannot be the intention of the insurance policies and is in any case not in public interest. In our opinion, in a dispute concerning a consumer, it is necessary for the courts to take a Full Judgment
DEVENDRA NATH SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U.P.
RAMNATH SAO (DECD) THRU HIS LRS & ORS. Vs. GOBERDHAN SAO (DECD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS
DR. JAYSHREE UJWAL INGOLE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
AJITSINH ARJUNSINH GOHIL Vs. BAR COUNCIL OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
HARI SHANKAR SHUKLA Vs. STATE OF U.P.
DEEPA E.V. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
CHHOTE LAL NISHAD (D) Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
MUKESH & ANR. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Compassionate appointments are not a source of recruitment and they are made to provide succour to the family of an employee who dies in harness. Full Judgment
ORISSA OLYMPIC ASSOCIKATION TH.GEN.SECRETARY Vs. STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY SEC.&ORS Vs. K. BALU & ANR
BINOY KUMAR MISHRA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR
VINEET KUMAR AND ORS Vs. STATE OF UP & ANR
Inherent power given to the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is with the purpose and object of advancement of justice. In case solemn process of Court is sought to be abused by a person with some oblique motive, the Court has to thwart the attempt at the very threshold. The Court cannot permit a prosecution to go on if Full Judgment