Judgments - Supreme Court of India
Bir Wati & Ors. VERSUS Union of India & Anr.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN VERSUS M/s Travancore Cochin Udyoga Mandal
SMT. BHARATI REDDY VERSUS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
Rakesh Kumar Paul versus State of Assam
Om Sai Punya Educational and Social Welfare Society & Another Versus All India Council for Technical Education and Another
The State of Bihar & Ors. VERSUS Modern Tent House & Anr
Lekh Raj(Dead) Through L.Rs.& Ors. VERSUS Ranjit Singh & Ors.
AZIZIA BEE @ SHAIK MUJEEB (D) THR. LRS. VERSUS GOVT.OF A.P. & ORS.
TERAPALLI DYVASAHATA KUMAR VERSUS S.M.KANTHA RAJU (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.
PRITI PATEL VERSUS NALIN SATYAKAM KOHLI & ORS.
PANDURANG DNYANDEV HANKARE VERSUS RAJSHREE SHAHU GOVERNMENT SERVANTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.
G. RAVI VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
Madhavan & Ors Versus The State of Tamil Nadu
Notably, the High Court has not considered the issue of quantum of sentence at all, but mechanically proceeded to affirm the sentence awarded by the Trial Court. From the factual position, which has emerged from the record, it is noticed that there was a pre-existing property dispute between the two families. The incident in question happened all of a sudden without any premeditation after PW1 questioned the appellants about their behavior. It was a free fight between the two family Full Judgment
Environment and Consumer Protection Foundation versus Union of India & Ors.
There can be little or no doubt at all that widows in some parts of the country are socially deprived and to an extent ostracized. Perhaps this is the reason why many of them choose to come to Vrindavan and other ashrams where, unfortunately, they are not treated with the dignity they deserve. This is evident from the article that caused this public interest litigation and the compilation of reports that this litigation has generated. It is to give voice Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus S. RAVICHANDRAN & ORS
It is for the employer to decide how many avenues of promotion to give to which branch. It is for the authorities to carry out the cadre review and decide whether the ministerial employees working on the ministerial side should be given more avenues of promotion. The court cannot by its decision change the opinion of expert bodies. Full Judgment
SURAJ PAL (D) THR. LR. Versus RAM MANORATH & ORS.
M/s. Sunder Marketing Associates versus State of Haryana & Ors.
J. Vasanthi & Ors. VERSUS N. Ramani Kanthammal (D) Rep. by LRs. & Ors.
Union of India and Ors. Versus Ex LAC Nallam Shiva
To put it differently, in the fact situation of the present case, it is not possible to hold that the punishment of dismissal was vindictive, unduly harsh or disproportionate to the offence committed by the respondent and especially after the Tribunal has positively concluded that failure of the respondent to communicate either to his unit or to the nearest military stationf or around 1½ years was uncondonable. Ordinarily, the Tribunal ought not to interfere with the order of punishment except Full Judgment