Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Mintu Dubey. Vs. Union of India through SP, CBI Jabalpur.
Head Notes : It is the settled position of law that mere recovery of amount is not sufficient to convict a person under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act if the same is not backed by demand and acceptance of bribe as an illegal gratification. The proof of demand of illegal gratification, thus, is the gravamen of the offence under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) & (ii) of the Act and in absence thereof, unmistakably the charge therefor, would fail. Mere acceptance Full Judgment
Vinod Kumar Sen Vs.Smt Shanti Devi and others
Rajkumar Singh & Ors. VsPushpendar Singh & Ors.
Ajay Patle Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Indrabhan & Others VERSUS Maanwati & Others
Smt. Geeta Omre VS. Smt. Chandrakanta Rai and another
Satendra Nath Vishwakarma VS The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Veena Vadini D.Ed College Prithvipur Distt. Tikamgarh Vs National Council For The Teacher Education
Manoj Shrivastava Versus High Court of M.P. and another
Water Resources Department Engineer versus Shri Manharan
Preeyush Jyotishi and another versus State of M.P. and others
Parishram Samaj Evam Kalyan Samiti versus State Of Madhya Pradesh
Jitendra Vs. State of M.P. and others
In these petitions, the pivotal question needs consideration is whether a reserve category candidate is entitled to be considered for compassionate appointment against a General category post ? In the opinion of this court, the reserve category candidate is also entitled to be considered against a General category post. The only requirement is that such candidate should be eligible in all respect as if he is a general category candidate except the caste. In my view, the test should be that Full Judgment