Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Badam and others Versus State of M.P.
Plea of Right of Private Defence – Even if the plea of Right of Private Defence is not specifically taken by accused, benefit can be given if the Right of Private Defence can be gathered from surrounding circumstances. 307 or 308 of IPC - Complainant tried to irrigate the landallotted to the accused – Complainant party was unarmed – Several injuries caused to injured persons -Accused exceeded Right of Private Defence – However,convicted under Section 308 of IPC instead of underSection Full Judgment
Krishna Kant Rathod Vs Union of India, through C.B.I.,Jabalpur
It is not proved that appellant had received money from complainant as bribe or illegal gratification. The complainant turned hostile, there was no other witnesses present at the time of transaction between complainant and appellant. The complainant disowned the contents of his complaint. In these set of facts Hon’ble Apex Court has observed “when complainant disowned his own statement the contents of complaint cannot be relied on”.In the present case the complainant in his examination in chief has categorically denied the Full Judgment
Huzra Bee Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - In view of the Constitutional Bench judgment in the case of Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia Vs. Shri Justice S. R. Tendolkar and others (AIR 1958 SC 538), seven Judge Bench decision in State of Karnataka Vs. Union of India (AIR 1978 SC 68) and law laid down in Kehar Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Delhi Admn. (AIR 1988 SC 1883), function of the Commission appointed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 is merely to Full Judgment
Madhyanchal Gramin Bank and others V/s Neeraj Kumar Barman and others
Law Laid Down - A daily wager, by the nomenclature itself, is not a regular employee as there is no established employer and employee relationship. Therefore, he has no right against the employer except as may be available to him under applicable laws such as Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Prohibition against the employer not to terminate services of a daily wager cannot be sought as it is not even available to regular employee. Full Judgment
Sandeep Dwivedi and Others Vs. M.P. Public Service Commission
Law laid down - M.P. Public Service Commission to scrutinize the cases to determine the eligibility and cut-off date provided in the advertisement and ascertain if they were having the requisite qualification on the cut-off date and then to proceed further in accordance with law. Full Judgment
Arvind Kumar Jain and others Vs. State of M.P. & Others
Law Laid Down - Once Notification in terms of Section 71(1) of the M.P. Town Improvement Trust Act, 1960 for acquisition of a land is published, the land vests with the Trust. As owner, the Trust is free to utilize it for the purpose it deems appropriate. Challenge on the ground of change of use of land from original purpose of the scheme; compensation having not been paid and there being no provision for proceeding for determination of compensation, is devoid Full Judgment
Rohit Agrawal Versus The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-II & another
Law laid down - Law relating to revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Full Judgment
Niharika Tiwari Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - The OMR answer sheets having scanned twice one after, interpolation in the OMR answer books was found to be a justified case for use of unfair means and thus order of cancellation of admission was maintained. Use of white fluid in the OMR answer sheets have been found to be valid invocation of unfair means as except the black ballpoint pen and the admit card no other accessories were permitted in the examination Full Judgment