Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Chakresh Patel Vs. State of M.P. and others
JAIN SARVODAYA VIDHYA GYANPITH SAMITI AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Pankaj Singh @ Sonu Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Krishan Mohan Agrawal Vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid Down - Framing of charge precisely mentioning the offence which in specific terms prescribes punishment for the same and not any other generic or approximate offence which may in generic terms prescribe punishment for the offence alleged. Charge framed u/S 409 IPC does not relate to breach of trust by a warehouse keeper, which offence is exclusively punishable u/s 407 IPC. Thus, charge for breach of trust by warehouse keeper framed u/S 409 IPC is not sustainable. The trial Court directed to Full Judgment
Tula Ram & Ors. Versus The State Of M.P.
KAPIL RAJ PRINZE Vs. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS
Hukum Singh -Vs- State of M.P.
ReNew Clean Energy Private Limited -V/s - M.P. Power Management Company Limited and another
Goldie Glass Industries V E R S U S State of M.P. and others
Girja Shankar Goswami vs. Keshavdas Shilpkar
Mohd. Yunus Munshi Thru. Next Friend Mohd. Kamar Hussain Munshi VS. Public In General
Kishanlal & Anr. Vs State of M.P.
Pramod Kumar Zopey Vs. Smt Smita Zopey
RAJESH KUMAR GOYAL Vs. M.P HIGH COURT AND ANOTHER
Roop Narayan Sahu -Versus- State of M.P. & others
Ideal Carpets Ltd. V E R S U S Union of India & others
Smt. Shobha Jain Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
It is not in dispute that merely giving help will not make the abetment of offence if the person who gave the help did not know that an offence was being committed or contemplated. The intention should be to help an offence or to facilitate the commission of crime. There is prima facie evidence on record for offence under Section 120-B of IPC of the meeting of minds for acceptance of money between Mahavir Prasad/husband and his wife/petitioner. In the present Full Judgment