Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Vinod S/o Rammlalji Chopra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Munna @ Kaniram & another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Anil Kumar Godha Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Suryabhan Choudhary Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Siddhamuni S/o Bisale Patel
Law laid down - If the testimony of prosecutrix is found trustworthy, the accused can be convicted even in the absence of evidence of lady doctor. Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh and others Versus Rajesh Kumar Shukla
Law laid down - The doctrine of equal pay for equal work would not be applicable even if the employees in two groups are doing identical work, unless there is complete and wholesale identity between them. The same can be invoked only when the employees are similarly situated. Full Judgment
M/s Pankaj Kumar Rai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid down - In the light of series of decisions of the Supreme Court, it is well settled that the provisos of the Statutes have to be read as a whole by giving harmonious construction to all the provisions of the law so that none of the provision is rendered redundant. Keeping in view the principle of harmonious construction, the third proviso to Rule 68(1) of M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 is additional relaxation to Rule 4 and 68(1) of the Full Judgment
Santosh Singh & Others Versus State of M.P
Abhilash Versus State of M.P
Uday Narayan Versus State of M.P
Manish Kumar Thakur Vs. State of M.P. & Others
Anil Pandre Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Conviction can be based on the circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur Vs. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jabalpur & another
Law Laid Down: (i) Limitation -inordinate delay in filing reference is required to be dealt with by the Labour Court in its proper perspective – In the present case, application for reinstatement was filed after 4 years, the same is held liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches. Reliance is placed on Prabhakar vs Joint Director, Sericulture Department and another, (2015) 15 SCC 1 (ii) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 25 - B(2)(a)(ii) - Burden of proof – Full Judgment
Surya Prakash Vs. Smt. Rachna
Law Laid Down - If there is any instance of domestic violence, for which an affirmative or prohibitory order is passed under Section 18 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the provisions of Section 31 of the Act can be invoked. Non-payment of maintenance allowance is also a breach of 'protection order' or 'interim protection order'. The order passed in Sunil @ Sonu vs. Sarita Chawla (Smt.), reported in 2009 (5) MPHT 319 is in accordance with Full Judgment
Smt. Shanti Bavaria Vs. State of M.P. & Others
Law Laid down - It is not necessary to obtain personal sanction of His Excellency, Governor of Madhya Pradesh for taking decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings, and if the council of Ministers have taken such decision, it will serve the purpose and meet the requirement of Rule 9 of the Pension Rules. Reliance is placed upon State of Madhya Pradesh and others Vs. Dr. Yashwant Trimbak, AIR 1996 SC 765 & Samsher Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab, (1974) 2 Full Judgment
Leela Bai Vs. Manorama Bai
Law laid down - The first appellate court while reversing the finding of the trial Court must record its finding in clear terms and explain how the reasonings of the trial Court are erroneous. Full Judgment
Smt. Saroj Rajak & another Vs. State of M.P.
Democratic Lawyers Forum Vs. Union of India & Others
Law Laid down - (1) Public Interest Litigation in service matters like selection, appointment, promotion, seniority and also disciplinary proceedings is not maintainable. Reliance is placed upon Janata Dal Vs. H.S. Choudhary, (1992) 4 SCC 305; Rajnit Prasad Vs. Union of India, (2000) 9 SCC 313; and, Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha Vs. Dhobei Sahoo and others, (2014) 1 SCC 161. (2) A citizen has a fundamental right to meet a person of his choice. Reliance is placed upon Writ Petition Full Judgment
Rajesh Kumar Miglani & Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law Laid Down - The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 being the Central Legislation does not contemplate grant of fitness certificate and it is left to be framed by the State Government, therefore, the issue of fitness certificate and payment of tax falls within the legislative competence of the State in terms of Section 65(2)(d) of the Act of 1988 and under Section 3 of the M.P. Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991. Thus, Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 48 of the M.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, Full Judgment