Judgments - Madhya Pradesh High Court
Dr. Ashish Khare Vs. State of M.P. and another
Rakesh Katare Vs. The Satpura Narmada Regional Rural Bank
The Manager, Western Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Mr. Prayag Modi
Law laid down - Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972- The gratuity is a valuable right of an employee. It is also a property under Article 300A of the Constitution. The gratuity can be withheld only as per act and to the extent permissible under various provisions of Gratuity Act. The allegations established against the petitioner show that he was found guilty of negligence. No allegations relating to riotous or disorderly conduct or for involving moral turpitude were alleged and established. Hence Full Judgment
Vijayh Singh @ Vijay Kumar Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
J.S. Chauhan Vs. Union of India and others
Law laid down - A charge sheet having culminated into punishment order and the incumbent having undergone a punishment cannot be withdrawn later even by a competent authority on the anvil that the earlier charge sheet and the order passed hereon was not by a competent authority. Full Judgment
Bhanu Shankar Raikwar Versus Vijay Shankar Raikwar and others
Law laid down - The principle of res judicata would apply to execution proceedings as they are continuation of a suit. If a judgment-debtor fails to raise an objection which he might and ought to have raised, the Court passing the decree for execution of the decree must be deemed to have decided the objection. Full Judgment
Devi Singh Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In a case of circumstantial evidence the prosecution has to establish that there must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. Full Judgment
Bhure Singh and Anr. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Applicability of Section 34 of IPC. Full Judgment
Dr. Sunny Juneja and others Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - The Professional Examination Board cannot change the reasoning in support of the order which was passed and on which basis the show cause notice was issued. An order passed, cannot be permitted to supplant the reasons to support the allegations of use of unfair means. Judgments relied upon: (1978) 1 SCC 405 (Mohinder Singh Gill and another vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and others) Judgment distinguished: (2010) 6 SCC 614 (Chairman, All India Railway Recruitment Board v. K. Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh and others Vs. Yugal Kishore Sharma
Law Laid Down - The context in which other judgments are rendered interpreting a word appearing in a statute are not relevant for the purpose of the Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967. The provisions of the Act, as amended by Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Dwitiya Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 1998 are required to be interpreted keeping in view the language, context, object and purpose of the Statute in question. The amendments in the Act so as to extend the age is Full Judgment
Istfaq Mohammad Vs. State of M.P. & others
Chingu @ Sohanlal and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ramadhar @ Daddi Kachhi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (I) If, in presence of the accused at his house something wrong has happened with his wife, then in view of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, he is under burden to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed. (II) Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Vikram Singh Paur Late Shri Tukoji Rao Paur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kripal Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Evidence of the prosecutrix is similar to evidence of the injured-complainant or witness. The testimony of the prosecutrix if found to be reliable, per se, may be sufficient to convict a culprit and no corroboration of her evidence is necessary. In prosecution of rape, law does not require corroboration. Absence of injury – external or internal, on the body of the prosecutrix would not render the testimony of the prosecutrix unreliable. Full Judgment
Smt. Simmi Dhillo Versus Jagdish Prasad Dubey and another
Khemchand Kachhi Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Admissibility of statement tendered by an accused to the police – Extra-judicial confession, admissibility of the evidence of statement under Section 6 of the Evidence Act, res gestae. Full Judgment