Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Manoj Sharma - V/s - State of M.P. & Others

WRIT PETITION, 5197 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

UNION OF INDIA Vs. SUCHCHASINGH

Criminal Appeal, 960 of 1998, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags NDPS
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s Shriram Builders Vs. State of M.P. & others

MP, 1099 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Anil Kumar and Another vs. State of MP and Another

MCRC, 10106 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Abhay Kumar Katare Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 5952 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2018

Law laid down - (1) 'Abetment' – Involves a mental preparedness of a person to instigate or intentionally aiding a person in doing a thing. Without a positive act on the part of the accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide – no offence can be said to be made. (2) The intention of the Legislature is that to convict a person under section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea and close proximate link to commit the Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dr. Divya Darshan Sharma and others

WA, 345 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2018

Law Laid Down - In absence of any definition being provided in the Statute or any statutory rule or instructions supplementing the Khel Sansthaon Evam Khiladiyon Ko Arthik Sahayata, Khel Vritti, Sammannidhi Niyam, 2006 as to what is “representation in the National games or recognized Senior National championship”, the meaning has to be assigned what is understood by a common citizen. The participation in the Zonal or the Inter-university competitions cannot be treated to be a representation in the National level games or Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

NISHAB BANO QURESHI VS. STATE OF MP & ORS.

WRIT PETITION, 17810 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Ramsingh Yadav vs. State of MP & anr.

MCRC, 11138 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Manohar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 146 of 2013, Judgment Date: Mar 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Ltd. v/s The Additional District Magistrate & Ors

WRIT PETITION, 23367 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 22, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Financial
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Yogendra Dusaj vs. State of MP

CRR, 217 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 20, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

The State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Nandu Ahirwar

MCRC, 3926 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 16, 2018

Law laid down - 1. In a case of circumstantial evidence, there must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. 2. In an appeal against the order of acquittal, the Court has to be very cautious in interfering with an appeal unless there are compelling and substantial grounds to Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Chief Managing Director, WCL & others Vs. Sheikh Yusuf

WA, 228 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 16, 2018

Law Laid Down - In absence of any allegation that the date of birth was not correctly recorded in Form-B, a statutory form stipulated under the Mines Rules, 1955, the service record or certificate of registration with Employment Exchange, which are based upon declaration of the employee, cannot be made basis of holding that the date of birth was not correctly mentioned in Form-B. The approximate age determined by the Age Determination Committee to be between 50 to 55 years which Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ashish @ Banti Sen Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 427 of 2008, Judgment Date: Mar 16, 2018

Law laid down - The evidence of injured eye-witness has great evidentiary value. Conviction can be based on the testimony of related eye-witnesses. Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar

Criminal Appeal, 2344 of 1997, Judgment Date: Mar 15, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

R. S. Ashatkar Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Bhopal

Criminal Appeal, 1004 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 15, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Principal, Maharshi Vidya Mandir Lehdra Naka, Sagar Vs. Labour Court, Sagar & Another

WA, 489 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 15, 2018

Law Laid Down - The scheme of the M.P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 particularly of Rule 10-A and Sub-rule (1) and (2) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules makes it abundantly clear that the notice of the first hearing is not required to be given when the party has already appeared before the Labour Court on the basis of the notice issued by the Court. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules is not mandatory but pertains to matter of procedure and therefore, it Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF M.P. Vs. Munna @ Shahnwaj

CRRFC, 1 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 15, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Kamal Singh & Ors. Versus Bhav singh Rajpoot & Ors.

WRIT PETITION, 843 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 15, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Padam Singh and others Vs. Radhelal and others

SA, 1693 of 2006, Judgment Date: Mar 14, 2018

Law laid down - Order 21 Rule 97 CPC 1. A person raising objection must show some prima-facie pleadings and material in his objection which makes it adjudicatable. 2. Executing Court is duty bound to examine the availability of bonafide adjudicatory material. 3. The adjudication mentioned in this provision need not essentially involved a detailed enquiry or collection of evidence. The Court can undertake the exercise of adjudication even on the allegations made by the obstructor. 4. In absence of minimum essential prima-facie pleadings Full Judgment

Tags Appeal